ArticlePloS one2020
Diagnostic limitations of clinical case definitions of pertussis in infants and children with severe lower respiratory tract infection.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leveraging large language models on free-text symptoms from participatory surveillance enhances pertussis forecasting in the United States.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Review on pertussis case definitions: a need for reliable disease surveillance.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Comparing Respiratory Illness Surveillance Case Definitions to Detect Bordetella pertussis in Children Aged <5 Years With Respiratory Illness in South Africa, 2017-2023.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Country-Specific Data and Priorities for Pertussis in Latin America: Recent Findings From the Global Pertussis Initiative.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Review
- A retrospective study on pediatric pertussis: comprehensive evaluation of symptoms, laboratory indicators, and diagnostic efficacy of case definitions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a diagnostic prediction model for children with pertussis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Bordetella spp. block eosinophil recruitment to suppress the generation of early mucosal protection.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Hospital-based prospective study of pertussis in infants and close contacts in Tehran, Iran.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDiagnosis of pertussis is challenging especially in infants. Most low and middle-income countries (LMIC) lack resources for laboratory confirmation, relying largely on clinical diagnosis alone for both case management and surveillance. This necessitates robust clinical case definitions.
objectivesThis study assesses the accuracy of clinical case definitions with and without lymphocytosis in diagnosing pertussis in children with severe lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in a LMIC setting.
methodsChildren hospitalized with severe LRTI in a South African hospital were prospectively enrolled and evaluated for pertussis using PCR on respiratory samples. Clinical signs and differential white cell counts were recorded. Sensitivity and specificity of pertussis clinical diagnosis using WHO and Global Pertussis Initiative (GPI) criteria; and with addition of lymphocytosis were assessed with PCR as the reference standard.
results458 children <10 years were enrolled. Bordetella pertussis infection was confirmed in 32 (7.0%). For WHO criteria, sensitivity was 78.1% (95% CI 60.7-89.2%) and specificity 15.5% (95% CI 12.4-19.3%); for GPI sensitivity was 34.4% (95% CI 20.1-52.1) and specificity 64.8% (95% CI 60.1-69.2%). Area under the curve (AUC) on receiver operating character (ROC) analysis was 0.58 (95% CI 0.46-0.70 for WHO criteria, and 0.72 (95% CI 0.56-0.88) for GPI with highest likelihood ratios of 5.33 and 4.42 respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was highest between five and seven days of symptoms for both criteria. Lymphocytosis had sensitivity of 31.3% (95% CI 17.5-49.3%) and specificity of 70.7% (95% CI 66.1-74.8%) and showed a marginal impact on improving clinical criteria.
conclusionClinical criteria lack accuracy for diagnosis and surveillance of pertussis. Non-outbreak settings should consider shorter durations in clinical criteria. New recommendations still fall short of what is required for a viable clinical screening test which means the need to improve access to laboratory diagnostic support remains crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.