ArticlePloS one2020
Serial testing of health care workers for tuberculosis infection: A prospective cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is There Value in Performing Yearly Screening for Latent Tuberculosis Infection by Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Among Patients Living With HIV in Non-Endemic Settings?Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Detection of latent tuberculosis infection in healthcare workers.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advancement in diagnostic approaches for latent tuberculosis: distinguishing recent from remote infections.One health outlook · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health Care Workers (HCW) may have an occupational risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and TB disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the 2-step strategy: tuberculin skin test (TST) followed by confirmation with Interferon (IFN)-γ- release assays (IGRAs) in HCW. A secondary objective was to determine the factors related to conversions and reversions. HCW at risk of occupational exposure who attended the Occupational Department of the Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol were included during the study period (2013-2016). All professionals testing negative for LTBI were included in a cohort study. These workers were followed up with the administration of a TST and an IGRA quantification at least one year after inclusion in the study. Workers with positive TST, regardless of the results of the IGRA tests, were followed-up with an IGRA. 255 workers were enrolled in the study and 108 workers from the same cohort were followed up. During the follow-up period, seven workers presented TST test conversion. One of these conversions was also confirmed by an IGRA test. There were 2 conversions of cases only testing positive with the IGRA. There have been only 2 reversions of cases testing negative with the IGRA. In this study, not all TST conversions were confirmed when using the IGRA test, which highlights the importance of the 2-step strategy. We have detected a low number of conversions and reversions. Our conclusions should be confirmed in studies with a longer follow-up time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.