Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32678851›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Health management information system (HMIS) data verification: A case study in four districts in Rwanda.

Alphonse Nshimyiryo, Catherine M Kirk, Sara M Sauer, Emmanuel Ntawuyirusha, Andrew Muhire, Felix Sayinzoga, Bethany Hedt-Gauthier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Regulatory framework for health information systems in Ethiopia: A qualitative document analysis.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alphonse NshimyiryoMaternal and Child Health Program, Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-2683-9459
Catherine M KirkMaternal and Child Health Program, Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0001-9103-2611
Sara M SauerDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Emmanuel NtawuyirushaPlanning, Health Financing and Information Systems, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Andrew MuhirePlanning, Health Financing and Information Systems, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Felix SayinzogaMaternal, Child and Community Health Division, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda.
Bethany Hedt-GauthierMaternal and Child Health Program, Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda.
Harvard University · USMinistry of Health · RWUniversity of Global Health Equity · RWRwanda Biomedical Center · RW

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN BIOSTATISTICST32ES007142 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI Brent Andrew Coull · 1985 to 2026
$11.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReliable Health Management and Information System (HMIS) data can be used with minimal cost to identify areas for improvement and to measure impact of healthcare delivery. However, variable HMIS data quality in low- and middle-income countries limits its value in monitoring, evaluation and research. We aimed to review the quality of Rwandan HMIS data for maternal and newborn health (MNH) based on consistency of HMIS reports with facility source documents.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study in 76 health facilities (HFs) in four Rwandan districts. For 14 MNH data elements, we compared HMIS data to facility register data recounted by study staff for a three-month period in 2017. A HF was excluded from a specific comparison if the service was not offered, source documents were unavailable or at least one HMIS report was missing for the study period. World Health Organization guidelines on HMIS data verification were used: a verification factor (VF) was defined as the ratio of register over HMIS data. A VF<0.90 or VF>1.10 indicated over- and under-reporting in HMIS, respectively.

resultsHigh proportions of HFs achieved acceptable VFs for data on the number of deliveries (98.7%;75/76), antenatal care (ANC1) new registrants (95.7%;66/69), live births (94.7%;72/76), and newborns who received first postnatal care within 24 hours (81.5%;53/65). This was slightly lower for the number of women who received iron/folic acid (78.3%;47/60) and tested for syphilis in ANC1 (67.6%;45/68) and was the lowest for the number of women with ANC1 standard visit (25.0%;17/68) and fourth standard visit (ANC4) (17.4%;12/69). The majority of HFs over-reported on ANC4 (76.8%;53/69) and ANC1 (64.7%;44/68) standard visits.

conclusionThere was variable HMIS data quality by data element, with some indicators with high quality and also consistency in reporting trends across districts. Over-reporting was observed for ANC-related data requiring more complex calculations, i.e., knowledge of gestational age, scheduling to determine ANC standard visits, as well as quality indicators in ANC. Ongoing data quality assessments and training to address gaps could help improve HMIS data quality.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesPostnatal CarePrenatal CareCross-Sectional StudiesData AccuracyDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornManagement Information SystemsRwanda

Identifiers

PMID32678851
PMCPMC7367468
OpenAlexW3043081018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.