Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32678688›Full record

Observational studyJCO oncology practice2020

Adoption of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Patterns of Care at the End of Life.

Fauzia Riaz, Geliang Gan, Fangyong Li, Amy J Davidoff, Kerin B Adelson, Carolyn J Presley, Blythe J Adamson, Pooja Shaw, Ravi B Parikh, Ronac Mamtani and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JCO oncology practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Navigating the Prescription Drug Information System.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  2. Novel Systemic Anticancer Treatments and Health Services Use at the End of Life Among Adults With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Learning about and living with toxicity: a qualitative study of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors for melanoma or lung cancer and their caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Anticancer therapy at end-of-life: A retrospective cohort study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. End-of-Life Systemic Oncologic Treatment in the Immunotherapy Era: The Role of Race, Insurance, and Practice Setting.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  13. You Get (offered) What You (can) Pay for: Explaining Disparities in End-of-Life Cancer Care.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Duration of palliative care involvement and immunotherapy treatment near the end of life among patients with cancer who died in-hospital.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Fauzia RiazCancer Outcomes Public Policy and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Geliang GanYale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.
Fangyong LiYale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.
Amy J DavidoffCancer Outcomes Public Policy and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Kerin B AdelsonCancer Outcomes Public Policy and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Carolyn J PresleyCancer Outcomes Public Policy and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Blythe J AdamsonFlatiron Health, New York, NY.
Pooja ShawFlatiron Health, New York, NY.
Ravi B ParikhAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Ronac MamtaniAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Cary P GrossCancer Outcomes Public Policy and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Yale Cancer Center · USFlatiron Health (United States) · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USStanford University · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Pathology Tissue Services Shared ResourceP30CA016359 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MEGAN C KING · 1985 to 2026
$85.0M
Yale University Clinical and Translational Science Award ProgramUL1TR000142 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2012 to 2015
$31.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000142NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the care of patients with cancer, it is unclear whether treatment at the end of life (EOL) has changed. Because aggressive therapy at the EOL is associated with increased costs and patient distress, we explored the association between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of ICIs and treatment patterns at the EOL.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, observational study using patient-level data from a nationwide electronic health record-derived database. Patients had advanced melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; cancer types with an ICI indication), or microsatellite stable (MSS) colon cancer (a cancer type without an ICI indication) and died between 2013 and 2017. We calculated annual proportions of decedents who received systemic cancer therapy in the final 30 days of life, using logistic regression to model the association between the post-ICI FDA approval time and use of systemic therapy at the EOL, adjusting for patient characteristics. We assessed the use of chemotherapy or targeted/biologic therapies at the EOL, before and after FDA approval of ICIs using Pearson chi-square test.

resultsThere was an increase in use of EOL systemic cancer therapy in the post-ICI approval period for both melanoma (33.9% to 43.2%;

conclusionThe adoption of ICIs was associated with a substantive increase in the use of systemic therapy at the EOL in melanoma and a smaller yet significant increase in NSCLC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsDeathHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32678688
PMCPMC8189605
OpenAlexW3042836624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.