Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32678320›Full record

ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2021

Association of home and ambulatory blood pressure variability with left ventricular mass index in chronic kidney disease patients.

Konstantinos Manousopoulos, Eleni Koroboki, Gerassimos Barlas, Aikaterini Lykka, Nefeli Tsoutsoura, Konstantina Flessa, Ioannis Kanakakis, Ioannis Paraskevaidis, Nikolaos Zakopoulos, Efstathios Manios

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Annual reports on hypertension research 2020.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Review
  5. Blood pressure variability and target organ damage regression in hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Konstantinos ManousopoulosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Eleni KorobokiDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Gerassimos BarlasComputer Science & Engineering Department, College of Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Aikaterini LykkaDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Nefeli TsoutsouraDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Konstantina FlessaDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Ioannis KanakakisDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Ioannis ParaskevaidisDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos ZakopoulosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Efstathios ManiosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. stathismanios@yahoo.gr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased blood pressure (BP) variability is associated with the development of target organ damage. However, the optimal type and index of BP variability (BPV) regarding their prognostic significance is unclear. The aim of our study was to compare the association of ambulatory and home BPV with the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). From a total of 1560 consecutive subjects, 137 hypertensive patients with CKD underwent home and ambulatory BP monitoring and echocardiographic measurements. The variability of home BP monitoring was quantified by using the standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and morning minus evening BP values. Ambulatory BPV was quantified using the SD, CV, and the time rate (TR) of BP variation. The univariate analysis demonstrated that day-to-day systolic SD and the 24-h TR of systolic BP (SBP) variation were significantly associated with the LVMI. The multivariate linear regression analysis showed a significant and independent association of the LVMI with the 24-h TR of SBP variation (B = 9.204, 95% CI: 1.735-16.672; p = 0.016). A 0.1-mmHg/min increase in the 24-h TR of SBP variation was associated with an increment of 9.204 g/m

Indexed as

HypertensionRenal Insufficiency, ChronicBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHumansSystoleBlood pressure monitoringBlood pressure variabilityChronic kidney diseaseLeft ventricular mass index

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.