Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32678316›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020

A comparison of Triple I classification with neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator recommendations in neonates born to mothers with clinical chorioamnionitis.

Cassandra Coleman, David L Carola, Amy J Sloane, Margaret A Lafferty, Amanda Roman, Yury Cruz, Kolawole Solarin, Zubair H Aghai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cassandra ColemanPediatrics, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital/Nemours, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David L CarolaNeonatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital/Nemours, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Amy J SloaneNeonatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital/Nemours, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Margaret A LaffertyNeonatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital/Nemours, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Amanda RomanMaternal Fetal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yury CruzMaternal Fetal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kolawole SolarinNeonatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital/Nemours, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Zubair H AghaiNeonatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital/Nemours, Philadelphia, PA, USA. zaghai@nemours.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5545-9706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator recommendations for infants born to mothers with clinical chorioamnionitis with those made by the Triple I classification. STUDY

designRetrospective analysis of chorioamnionitis-exposed neonates ≥35 weeks. EOS risk was calculated with baseline risks of 0.5/1000 and 4/1000. Mothers were retrospectively categorized using the Triple I classification. Calculator recommendations were compared with the Triple I classification recommendations.

resultsWe included 687 chorioamnionitis-exposed neonates. With a baseline risk of 0.5/1000, the calculator recommended no evaluation in 68.4% of infants of mothers with confirmed Triple I. With a baseline risk of 4/1000, 62.3% of infants of mothers with confirmed Triple I and 57.1% of infants born to mothers who did not meet fever criteria would have received evaluation.

conclusionsThe EOS calculator with either baseline risk does not recommend evaluation in a large number of infants born to mothers with confirmed Triple I.

Indexed as

ChorioamnionitisNeonatal SepsisSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMothersPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.