Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32678285›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial.

Nitika Kumari, Denise Taylor, Usman Rashid, Alain C Vandal, Paul F Smith, Nada Signal

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Reinforcement feedback impairs locomotor adaptation and retention.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nitika KumariHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. nitika.kumari@aut.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5135-1682
Denise TaylorHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0955-5702
Usman RashidHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1109-5493
Alain C VandalDepartment of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3153-2953
Paul F SmithDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Brain Health Research Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Nada SignalHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effect of repeated anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) on learning a split-belt treadmill task. Thirty healthy individuals randomly received three consecutive sessions of active or sham anodal ctDCS during split-belt treadmill training. Motor performance and strides to steady-state performance were evaluated before (baseline), during (adaptation), and after (de-adaptation) the intervention. The outcomes were measured one week later to assess absolute learning and during the intervention to evaluate cumulative, consecutive, and session-specific effects. Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects regression models. During adaptation, there was no significant difference in absolute learning between the groups (p > 0.05). During de-adaptation, a significant difference in absolute learning between the groups (p = 0.03) indicated slower de-adaptation with anodal ctDCS. Pre-planned secondary analysis revealed that anodal ctDCS significantly reduced the cumulative (p = 0.01) and consecutive-session effect (p = 0.01) on immediate adaptation. There were significant cumulative (p = 0.02) and session-specific effects (p = 0.003) on immediate de-adaptation. Repeated anodal ctDCS does not enhance motor learning measured during adaptation to a split-belt treadmill task. However, it influences the maintenance of learnt walking patterns, suggesting that it may be beneficial in maintaining therapeutic effects.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdolescentAdultCerebellumDouble-Blind MethodExercise TestHumansLearningMalePsychomotor PerformanceTranscranial Direct Current StimulationWalking

Identifiers

PMID32678285
PMCPMC7366632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.