ArticleScientific reports2020
Bayesian method for inferring the impact of geographical distance on intensity of communication.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of urban-rural integration in the Jinan metropolitan area.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Modelling spatial heterogeneity in exposure buffers and risk: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Spatially-embedded networks represent a large class of real-world networks of great scientific and societal interest. For example, transportation networks (such as railways), communication networks (such as Internet routers), and biological networks (such as fungal foraging networks) are all spatially embedded. Both the density of interactions (presence of edges) and intensity of interactions (edge weights) are typically found to decrease as a function of spatial separation of nodes in these networks. Communication and mobility of groups of individuals have also been shown to decline with their spatial separation, and the so-called gravity model postulates that this decline takes the form of a power-law holding at all distances. There is however some evidence that the rate of decline might change as the distance increases beyond a certain value, called a change point, but there have been few statistically principled methods for determining the existence and location of change points or assessing the change in intensity of interactions associated with them. We introduce such a method within the Bayesian paradigm and apply it to anonymized mobile call detail records (CDRs). Our results are potentially useful in settings where understanding social and spatial mixing of people is important, such as in the design of cluster randomized trials for studying interventions for infectious diseases, but we also anticipate the method to be useful for investigating more generally how distance may affect tie strengths in general in spatially embedded networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.