Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32678110›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Rapid assessment of ocular drug delivery in a novel ex vivo corneal model.

Ghazala Begum, Thomas Leigh, Ella Courtie, Richard Moakes, Gibran Butt, Zubair Ahmed, Saaeha Rauz, Ann Logan, Richard J Blanch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Topical pyridostigmine for ocular myasthenia gravis: a translational hypothesis.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Enhancing Rose Bengal penetration inTherapeutic delivery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ghazala BegummiRNA Diagnostics, Birmingham, UK.
Thomas LeighSchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ella CourtieNeuroscience and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Richard MoakesSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gibran ButtNeuroscience and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Zubair AhmedNeuroscience and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Saaeha RauzNeuroscience and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ann LoganNeuroscience and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Richard J BlanchNeuroscience and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. blanchrj@bham.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6142-3280
NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBBirmingham and Midland Eye Centre · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug delivery by topical application has higher patient acceptance and lower morbidity than intraocular injection, but many ophthalmic treatments are unable to enter the eye or reach the posterior segment after topical application. The first stage towards posterior segment delivery after topical application is ocular surface penetration and existing models are in vivo or use large quantities of tissue. We therefore developed a novel ex vivo model using discs of porcine and human cornea and sclera (5 mm diameter) to assess penetration of a candidate neuroprotective siRNA. siRNA against caspase 2 or control solutions of known penetrance were applied to the corneal epithelial surface and trans-corneal penetration and corneal adsorbance measured at fixed time points. To demonstrate that leakage did not occur, we applied dextran blue, which should not penetrate the intact cornea and did not do so in our model. Fluorescein penetration (0.09%) was less than rhodamine B (6.98%) at 60 min. siCASP2 penetration was 0.01% by 60 min. When the applied siCASP2 was washed off after 2 min, (representing lacrimal drainage) 0.071% penetrated porcine cornea by 60 min and 0.0002% penetrated human cornea and 0.001% penetrated human sclera. Our ex vivo model rapidly and cost-effectively assesses transcorneal penetration of candidate topical therapies, allowing rates of trans-corneal penetration for potential therapies such as siRNA to be evaluated with small quantities of human or animal tissue.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAdministration, OphthalmicAnimalsCaspase 2CorneaHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceModels, AnimalOphthalmic SolutionsPermeabilityRNA, Small InterferingSwineCaspase 2Ophthalmic SolutionsRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID32678110
PMCPMC7366725
OpenAlexW3042580498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.