Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32678062›Full record

Trial reportPreventing chronic disease2020

Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among American Indians and Alaska Natives.

Donald Haverkamp, Kevin English, Jasmine Jacobs-Wingo, Amanda Tjemsland, David Espey

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Preventing chronic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Colorectal Cancer in the American Indian and Alaska Native Community: A Holistic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessing colorectal cancer screening and outcomes among First Nations people in Alberta.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donald HaverkampCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Kevin EnglishAlbuquerque Area Indian Health Board, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Jasmine Jacobs-WingoCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Amanda TjemslandCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
David EspeyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USIndian Health Board · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionScreening rates for colorectal cancer are low in many American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities. Direct mailing of a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit can address patient and structural barriers to screening. Our objective was to determine if such an evidence-based intervention could increase colorectal cancer screening among AI/AN populations.

methodsWe recruited study participants from 3 tribally operated health care facilities and randomly assigned them to 1 of 3 study groups: 1) usual care, 2) mailing of FIT kits, and 3) mailing of FIT kits plus follow-up outreach by telephone and/or home visit from an American Indian Community Health Representative (CHR).

resultsAmong participants who received usual care, 6.4% returned completed FIT kits. Among participants who were mailed FIT kits without outreach, 16.9% returned the kits - a significant increase over usual care (P < .01). Among participants who received mailed FIT kits plus CHR outreach, 18.8% returned kits, which was also a significant increase over usual care (P < .01) but not a significant increase compared with the mailed FIT kit-only group (P = .44). Of 165 participants who returned FIT kits during the study, 39 (23.6%) had a positive result and were referred for colonoscopy of which 23 (59.0%) completed the colonoscopy. Twelve participants who completed a colonoscopy had polyps, and 1 was diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

conclusionDirect mailing of FIT kits to eligible community members may be a useful, population-based strategy to increase colorectal cancer screening among AI/AN people.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAlaska NativesAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFecesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID32678062
PMCPMC7380299
OpenAlexW3043168534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.