Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32678052›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2020

Quality indicators for a geriatric emergency care (GeriQ-ED) - an evidence-based delphi consensus approach to improve the care of geriatric patients in the emergency department.

Susanne Schuster, Katrin Singler, Stephen Lim, Mareen Machner, Klaus Döbler, Harald Dormann

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Geriatric care assistance in emergency departments: position paper of DGIIN, DGINA, and DGG].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Susanne SchusterFaculty of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. susanne.schuster@evhn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4648-2597
Katrin SinglerInstitute for Biomedicine of Ageing, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
Stephen LimAcademic Geriatric Medicine, University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Southampton, UK.
Mareen MachnerCharité - University of Medicine, Public Health Academy, Berlin, Germany.
Klaus DöblerCompetence Center Quality Management in Health Care, MDK Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart, Germany.
Harald DormannFaculty of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn emergency care, geriatric requirements and risks are often not taken sufficiently into account. In addition, there are neither evidence-based recommendations nor scientifically developed quality indicators (QI) for geriatric emergency care in German emergency departments. As part of the GeriQ-ED© research project, quality indicators for geriatric emergency medicine in Germany have been developed using the QUALIFY-instruments.

methodsUsing a triangulation methodology, a) clinical experience-based quality aspects were identified and verified, b) research-based quality statements were formulated and assessed for relevance, and c) preliminary quality indicators were operationalized and evaluated in order to recommend a feasible set of final quality indicators.

resultsInitially, 41 quality statements were identified and assessed as relevant. Sixty-seven QI (33 process, 29 structure and 5 outcome indicators) were extrapolated and operationalised. In order to facilitate implementation into daily practice, the following five quality statements were defined as the GeriQ-ED© TOP 5: screening for delirium, taking a full medications history including an assessment of the indications, education of geriatric knowledge and skills to emergency staff, screening for patients with geriatric needs, and identification of patients with risk of falls/ recurrent falls. DISCUSSION: QIs are regarded as gold standard to measure, benchmark and improve emergency care. GeriQ-ED© QI focused on clinical experience- and research-based recommendations and describe for the first time a standard for geriatric emergency care in Germany. GeriQ-ED© TOP 5 should be implemented as a minimum standard in geriatric emergency care.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalGeriatric AssessmentQuality Indicators, Health CareAccidental FallsAgedDeliriumDelphi TechniqueEmergency MedicineGeriatricsHumansInservice TrainingMass ScreeningMedication ReconciliationNeeds AssessmentQuality ImprovementRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID32678052
PMCPMC7364502
OpenAlexW3042865825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.