Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32678039›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Comparison of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma prognoses in Chinese patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer following radical surgery.

Xiaojing Zhang, Zunfu Lv, Xiaoxian Xu, Zhuomin Yin, Hanmei Lou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaojing ZhangDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute ofCancer Research and Basic Medicine (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Banshan East Road, Hangzhou, 310022, P. R. China.
Zunfu LvDepartment of Agriculture and Food Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Lin'an, 311300, P. R. China.
Xiaoxian XuDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute ofCancer Research and Basic Medicine (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Banshan East Road, Hangzhou, 310022, P. R. China.
Zhuomin YinDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute ofCancer Research and Basic Medicine (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Banshan East Road, Hangzhou, 310022, P. R. China.
Hanmei LouDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute ofCancer Research and Basic Medicine (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Banshan East Road, Hangzhou, 310022, P. R. China. hanmeildr@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4314-3426
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital · CNZhejiang A & F University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare adenocarcinoma (AC) and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) prognoses in patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 240 patients with AC and 130 patients with ASC. Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression models, and log-rank tests were used for statistical analysis.

resultsPatients with ASC had higher frequencies of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) > 5 ng/ml (p = 0.049 and p = 0.013, respectively); moreover, they were much older (P = 0.029) than patients with AC. There were no clinically significant differences in overall survival (OS) between the groups. When stratified into three risk groups based on clinicopathological features, survival outcomes did not differ between patients with AC and those with ASC in any risk group. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node metastasis (LNM) was an independent risk factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS in patients with AC and in patients with ASC. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) > 5 ng/ml and SCC-Ag > 5 ng/ml were independent predictors of RFS and OS in patients with AC. In addition, among those stratified as intermediate-risk, patients with ASC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) had significantly better RFS and OS (P = 0.036 and P = 0.047, respectively).

conclusionsWe did not find evidence to suggest that AC and ASC subtypes of cervical cancer were associated with different survival outcomes. CCRT is beneficial for survival in intermediate-risk patients with ASC, but not in those with AC. Serum tumour markers can assist in evaluating prognosis and in providing additional information for patient-tailored therapy for cervical AC.

Indexed as

HysterectomyAdenocarcinomaAdultAge FactorsCarcinoembryonic AntigenCarcinoma, AdenosquamousCervix UteriChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChinaDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalCarcinoembryonic AntigenAdenocarcinomaAdenosquamous carcinomaConcurrent chemoradiotherapyRadiotherapySurvival

Identifiers

PMID32678039
PMCPMC7367379
OpenAlexW3042578387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.