Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32677985›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2020

Can levosimendan reduce ECMO weaning failure in cardiogenic shock?: a cohort study with propensity score analysis.

Enrique Guilherme, Matthias Jacquet-Lagrèze, Matteo Pozzi, Felix Achana, Xavier Armoiry, Jean-Luc Fellahi

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04323709 (Levosimendan for Reducing Veno-arterial ECMO Weaning Failure During Refractory Cardiogenic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04323709 completednot on this map

Levosimendan for Reducing Veno-arterial ECMO Weaning Failure During Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: a Retrospective Propensity Score Analysis

TypeobservationalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2019 to 2020Enrolled200ConditionsCardiogenic Shock, Refractory ShockArmsData collection, Data analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of levosimendan on the outcome of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Enrique GuilhermeHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9261-1682
Matthias Jacquet-LagrèzeHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lyon, France. matthias.jacquet-lagreze@chu-lyon.fr.
Matteo PozziHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Service de Chirurgie Cardiaque, Lyon, France.
Felix AchanaNuffield Department of Primary care, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Xavier ArmoiryLyon School of Pharmacy (ISPB), Public Health department/UMR CNRS 5510 MATEIS, I2B Team, Lyon, France.
Jean-Luc FellahiHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lyon, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVeno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has been increasingly used over the last decade in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. ECMO weaning can, however, be challenging and lead to circulatory failure and death. Recent data suggest a potential benefit of levosimendan for ECMO weaning. We sought to further investigate whether the use of levosimendan could decrease the rate of ECMO weaning failure in adult patients with refractory cardiogenic shock.

methodsWe performed an observational single-center cohort study. All patients undergoing VA-ECMO from January 2012 to December 2018 were eligible and divided into two groups: group levosimendan and group control (without levosimendan). The primary endpoint was VA-ECMO weaning failure defined as death during VA-ECMO treatment or within 24 h after VA-ECMO removal. Secondary outcomes were mortality at day 28 and at 6 months. The two groups were compared after propensity score matching. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsTwo hundred patients were analyzed (levosimendan group: n = 53 and control group: n = 147). No significant difference was found between groups on baseline characteristics except for ECMO duration, which was longer in the levosimendan group (10.6 ± 4.8 vs. 6.5 ± 4.7 days, p < 0.001). Levosimendan administration started 6.6 ± 5.4 days on average following ECMO implantation. After matching of 48 levosimendan patients to 78 control patients, the duration of ECMO was similar in both groups. The rate of weaning failure was 29.1% and 35.4% in levosimendan and control groups, respectively (OR: 0.69, 95%CI: 0.25-1.88). No significant difference was found between groups for all secondary outcomes.

conclusionLevosimendan did not improve the rate of successful VA-ECMO weaning in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04323709 .

Indexed as

AdultAgedCardiotonic AgentsCohort StudiesExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreShock, CardiogenicSimendanVentilator WeaningCardiotonic AgentsSimendanCardiogenic shockCirculatory failureECMO weaning failureLevosimendanVA-ECMO

Identifiers

PMID32677985
PMCPMC7367381
OpenAlexW3042260922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.