ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020
Percutaneous fine-needle aspiration for pyogenic liver abscess (3-6 cm): a two-center retrospective study.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Odontogenic liver abscess in one patient.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Pyogenic Hepatic Abscess as a Complication of Appendicitis: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Optimal timing of pyogenic liver abscess evacuation: The role of early ultrasound-guided intervention.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Needle Aspiration and Antibiotic Injection for Subperiosteal Orbital Abscess: A Case Study and 3-Year Follow-Up.The American journal of case reports · 2024Article
- Clinical characteristics and management of liver abscess in The Gambia, a resource-limited country.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Liver abscess in the caudate lobe caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae: a rare case report and literature review.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Review
- Article
- Early percutaneous catheter drainage in protecting against prolonged fever among patients with pyogenic liver abscess: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine · 2022Article
- Multidisciplinary out-patient treatment with monitoring by telemedicine for a large-volume multifocal pyogenic liver abscess in times of the pandemic.Clinical case reports · 2021Article
- Utility of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Pyogenic Liver Abscess: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Association of blood culture with carbapenem use in pyogenic liver abscess: a two-center retrospective study.BMC emergency medicine · 2021Observational
- Clinical comparison of febrile and afebrile patients with pyogenic liver abscess: A two-centre retrospective study.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe role of ultrasonography-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration (PNA) for pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) remains without consensus, especially in abscesses 3 to 6 cm in diameter. The objective of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of PNA combined with antibiotics.
methodsThis was a retrospective study of patients with PLA that were from 3 to 6 cm in diameter who treated at two medical centers in Shanghai, China, from January 2014 to March 2019. Patients were divided into groups treated by PNA plus antibiotics or antibiotics alone. Patients demographics and clinical data related diagnosis, antibiotic treatment, and patient outcomes were analyzed.
resultsOut of a total of 94 PLA patients, 42 (44.7%) patients received PNA combined with antibiotics, and 52 (55.3%) received antibiotics alone. There were no complications related to PNA. In the PNA group, 13 (31.7%) patients with negative blood culture and 8 (19.5%) patients without blood culture were microbiologically confirmed via aspiration. The time for temperature normalization (P < 0.001) and the reduction rate of C-reactive protein within the first week (P = 0.031) were significantly lower in the PNA group. In the multivariate analysis, treatment with PNA was more likely to result in clinical improvement of PLA (odds ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.11-0.96, P = 0.043).
conclusionsPNA combined with antibiotics appears to be a safe, effective, and promising treatment for PLA of 3-6 cm in size. Furthermore, the technique allows for direct microbial sample, which can improve the selection of antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.