Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32677561›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2020

Implant Retention or Removal for Management of Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Surgery.

Aakash Agarwal, Amey Kelkar, Ashish G Agarwal, Daksh Jayaswal, Christian Schultz, Arvind Jayaswal, Vijay K Goel, Anand K Agarwal, Sandeep Gidvani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aakash AgarwalUniversity of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6183-3765
Amey KelkarUniversity of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Ashish G AgarwalPrimus Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Daksh JayaswalUniversity of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Christian SchultzUniversity of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Arvind JayaswalPrimus Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Vijay K GoelUniversity of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Anand K AgarwalUniversity of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Sandeep GidvaniOrthoNorCal, Inc, Los Gatos, CA, USA.
BLK Super Speciality Hospital · INUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designA literature review.

objectiveTo summarize the implant removal rate, common bacterial organisms found, time of onset, ratio of superficial to deep infection, and regurgitating the prevalence among all the retrospective and prospective studies on management and characterization of surgical site infections (SSIs).

methodsPubMed was searched for articles published between 2000 and 2018 on the management or characterization of SSIs after spinal surgery. Only prospective and retrospective studies were included.

resultsA total of 49 articles were found relevant to the objective. These studies highlighted the importance of implant removal to avoid recurrence of SSI. The common organisms detected were methicillin-resistant

conclusionLong-term antibiotics administration, and continuous irrigation and debridement were common suggestion among the authors; however, the key measure undertaken or implied by most authors to avoid risk of recurrence was removal or replacement of implants for late-onset SSI.

Indexed as

biofilmcontaminationimplant removalimplant retentionreadmissionrevision surgerysurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID32677561
PMCPMC7359681
OpenAlexW2968189147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.