Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32676873›Full record

Trial reportNeurocritical care2021

Efficacy and Safety of a Nasopharyngeal Catheter for Selective Brain Cooling in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective, Non-randomized Pilot Study.

Raphael Einsfeld Simões Ferreira, Bernardo Lembo Conde de Paiva, Flávio Geraldo Rezende de Freitas, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Gisele Sampaio Silva, Rafael Mônaco Raposo, Conrado Feisthauer Silveira, Ricardo Silva Centeno

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurocritical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raphael Einsfeld Simões FerreiraDepartamento de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Av. Moema 170, Cj. 83. Moema, São Paulo, SP, 04077-020, Brazil. rferreira@unifesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1167-142X
Bernardo Lembo Conde de PaivaServiço de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil.
Flávio Geraldo Rezende de FreitasDepartamento de Anestesiologia, Dor e Terapia Intensiva, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Flávia Ribeiro MachadoDepartamento de Anestesiologia, Dor e Terapia Intensiva, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gisele Sampaio SilvaDepartamento de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Av. Moema 170, Cj. 83. Moema, São Paulo, SP, 04077-020, Brazil.
Rafael Mônaco RaposoServiço de Otorrinolaringologia UNIFESP e Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil.
Conrado Feisthauer SilveiraDepartamento de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Av. Moema 170, Cj. 83. Moema, São Paulo, SP, 04077-020, Brazil.
Ricardo Silva CentenoDepartamento de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Av. Moema 170, Cj. 83. Moema, São Paulo, SP, 04077-020, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRHospital Santa Paula · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy objective was to determine whether a novel nasopharyngeal catheter could be used to cool the human brain after traumatic brain injury, and the safety objective was to assess the local and systemic effects of this therapeutic strategy.

methodsThis was a prospective, non-randomized, interventional clinical trial that involved five patients with severe traumatic brain injury. The intervention consisted of inducing and maintaining selective brain cooling for 24 h by positioning a catheter in the nasopharynx and circulating cold water inside the catheter in a closed-loop arrangement. Core temperature was maintained at ≥ 35 °C using counter-warming.

resultsIn all study participants, a brain temperature reduction of ≥ 2 °C was achieved. The mean brain temperature reduction from baseline was 2.5 ± 0.9 °C (P = .04, 95% confidence interval). The mean systemic temperature was 37.3 ± 1.1 °C at baseline and 36.0 ± 0.8 °C during the intervention. The mean difference between the brain temperature and the systemic temperature during intervention was - 1.2 ± 0.8 °C (P = .04). The intervention was well tolerated with no significant changes observed in the hemodynamic parameters. No relevant variations in intracranial pressure and transcranial Doppler were observed. The laboratory results underwent no major changes, aside from the K

conclusionThe results suggest that our noninvasive method for selective brain cooling, using a novel nasopharyngeal catheter, was effective and safe for use in humans.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticHypothermia, InducedBody TemperatureBrainCathetersHumansNasopharynxPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesCraniocerebral traumaHypothermiaInduced HypothermiaNasal cavityNasopharynxTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID32676873
OpenAlexW3043219163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.