Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32676864›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2021

Selecting between iron-rich and clay-rich soils: a geophagy field experiment with black-and-white colobus monkeys in the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda.

Paula A Pebsworth, Thibaud Gruber, Joshua D Miller, Klaus Zuberbühler, Sera L Young

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fur rubbing inPrimate biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Paula A PebsworthDepartment of Anthropology, The University of Texas, San Antonio, TX, USA. ppebsworth@mac.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8865-8389
Thibaud GruberSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joshua D MillerDepartment of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2171-856X
Klaus ZuberbühlerSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Sera L YoungDepartment of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1763-1218
Northwestern University · USNational Institute of Advanced Studies · INUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation CR13I1_162720Swiss National Science Foundation P300PA_164678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geophagy, the intentional consumption of soil, has been observed in humans and numerous other animal species. Geophagy has been posited to be adaptive, i.e., consumed soil protects against gastrointestinal distress and/or supplements micronutrients. We conducted a field experiment in the Budongo Forest, Uganda, to investigate geophagic behaviors, including soil preference, the quantity of soil eaten, and competition for access to preferred soils. We placed pairs of artificial tree stumps at two existing geophagy sites. One stump contained soil from the surrounding area, Sonso, that could supplement bioavailable iron. The other stump contained soil from a neighboring community, Waibira, that was richer in clay minerals, which could provide protection from plant secondary compounds. We monitored activity and engagement with the stumps for 10 days using camera traps. After 5 days, we reversed the type of soil that was in the stumps at both sites (i.e., a crossover design). Only Colobus guereza (black-and-white colobus monkeys) interacted with the stumps. These monkeys used visual and olfactory cues to select between the two soils and exclusively ate the clay-rich soil, consuming 9.67 kg of soil over 4.33 h. Our findings lend the greatest plausibility to the protection hypothesis. Additionally, monkeys competed for access to the stumps, and 13% of the videos captured aggression, including pushing, excluding, and chasing other individuals from the experimental stumps. Nine episodes of vigilance and flight behavior were also observed. Given that intentionally ingested soil is a valuable resource that may confer health benefits, geophagy sites should be conserved and protected.

Indexed as

PicaAggressionAnimalsChoice BehaviorClayColobusFeeding BehaviorFemaleIronMaleSoilUgandaClayIronSoilBioavailable ironDetoxificationField experimentNonhuman primatesSoil eating

Identifiers

PMID32676864
OpenAlexW3043401486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.