Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32676789›Full record

Trial reportPharmaceutical research2020

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacogenetic Study of Etoposide in High-Dose Protocol (TI-CE) for Advanced Germ Cell Tumors.

Sotheara Moeung, Christine Chevreau, Sabrina Marsili, Christophe Massart, Aude Fléchon, Rémy Delva, Gwenaëlle Gravis, Jean-Pierre Lotz, Jacques-Olivier Bay, Marine Gross-Goupil and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pharmaceutical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Sotheara MoeungInstitut Claudius-Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Christine ChevreauInstitut Claudius-Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Sabrina MarsiliInstitut Claudius-Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Christophe MassartOncologie Médicale, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Aude FléchonCentre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Rémy DelvaInstitut De Cancérologie de l'Ouest Paul Papin, Angers, France.
Gwenaëlle GravisInstitut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Jean-Pierre LotzHôpital Tenon, Paris, France.
Jacques-Olivier BayCHU, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Marine Gross-GoupilHôpital Saint André, Bordeaux, France.
Thomas FilleronInstitut Claudius-Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Caroline DelmasInstitut Claudius-Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Thierry LafontInstitut Claudius-Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Etienne ChatelutInstitut Claudius-Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France. chatelut.etienne@iuct-oncopole.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7740-9096
Fabienne ThomasInstitut Claudius-Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Inserm · FRInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRCentre Léon Bérard · FRHôpital Saint-André · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

Direction Générale de l'offre de Soins PHRC 2008 - project#18-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEtoposide dosing is based on body surface area. We evaluated if further dose individualization would be required for high dose (HD) etoposide within the TI-CE (taxol, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) protocol.

methodsEighty-eight patients received 400 mg/m

resultsThe inter-patient, inter- and intra-cycle variabilities of clearance were 16%, 9% and 0.1%, respectively. The PK-PD relationship was not significant despite a trend toward higher etoposide exposure in patients responding to treatment. A significant correlation was found between exposure and extended neutropenia at cycle 3. A significant association between UGT1A1*28 polymorphism and late neutropenia was observed but needs further evaluation.

conclusionsThe present study suggests that neither a priori dose individualization nor dose adaptation using TDM is required validating body surface area dosing of etoposide in the TI-CE protocol.

Indexed as

PharmacogeneticsAdultAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinDrug MonitoringEtoposideFemaleGenotypeHumansIfosfamideInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCarboplatinEtoposideIfosfamidePaclitaxeletoposidegerm cell tumorshigh-dose regimenpharmacogeneticspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID32676789
OpenAlexW3043089086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.