ReviewDer Orthopade2020
[Low-grade-infections after spondylodeses-A chameleon? : Current findings and therapeutic strategies].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative Spinal Implant Infections (PSII)-A Systematic Review: What Do We Know So Far and What is Critical About It?Global spine journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow-grade infections are caused by low-virulence pathogens. The course of these infections is often mild, which is why they are often delayed or not recognized at all. Chronic infections can lead to osteolysis and implant loosening. The rate of complications requiring revision, such as implant loosening or material failure, is known from the literature. However, the rate of low-grade infections in patients requiring spinal revision surgery remains unclear. PURPOSE: The aim of this review is to present the latest treatment strategies for low-grade infections. The diagnostic and therapeutic options are summarized in the form of algorithms. The aim of this work is to raise an awareness of the possibility of a low-grade infection in patients undergoing spinal revision surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsReview of the literature
resultsThe detection of low-grade infections is difficult from both a clinical and a radiological point of view. In the event of unexplained implant loosening or failure despite the lack of local inflammatory signs and often normal laboratory parameters, a low-grade infection must be considered. Multiple microbiological sampling must be requested as part of the revision surgery. A histological examination is recommended for all revision surgery, especially if a low-grade infection is suspected. The diagnosis should ideally be completed by sonicating the implants with subsequent microbiological incubation of the preserved samples. If a low-grade infection is suspected, the biofilm-covered implant should be removed or replaced if instability/no fusion is present. The use of topical antibiotics could be useful, but its effectiveness in treating low-grade infections has not yet been sufficiently demonstrated. DISCUSSION: An algorithm for clinical decision-making in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic options is suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.