ArticleEndoscopy international open2020
Improved detection of colorectal adenomas by high-quality colon cleansing.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- 1L NER1006 can improve rates of adequate and high-quality bowel cleansing in the right colon: a post hoc analysis of two randomised clinical trials.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Impact of Bowel Cleansing on Polyp and Adenoma Detection Rate: Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.Cancers · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-assisted system for automatic Boston scoring of bowel cleanliness in colonoscopy (with video).Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of 1L polyethylene glycol and ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in patients aged 80 years or older.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Bowel cleansing effectiveness and safety of 1L PEG + Asc in the real-world setting: Observational, retrospective, multicenter study of over 13000 patients.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- An Expert Consensus to Standardize Assessment of Bowel Cleansing for Clinical Trials of Bowel Preparations for Crohn's Disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Automated Detection of Bowel Preparation Scoring and Adequacy With Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Predictive Factors of Adequate Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy in the Elderly: A Retrospective Analysis of a Prospective Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Prediction of Inadequate Colon Capsule Cleansing: A Cohort Selection Guided by CC-CLEAR.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- The Effectiveness and Tolerability of a Very Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Compared to Low and High-Volume Polyethylene Glycol-Solutions in the Real-Life Setting.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparison of Procedural Sequences in Sedated Same-Day Bidirectional Endoscopy with Water-Exchange Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Bowel preparation with 1L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate NER1006 doubles the chance to detect three or more adenomas in overweight or obese males.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Bowel-cleansing efficacy of the 1L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 (PLENVU) in patient subgroups in two phase III trials.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Toward high-quality bowel preparation in Italy: insights from a nationwide cross-sectional survey of endoscopists.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.