Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32676505›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Canine Traditional Laboratory Tests and Cardiac Biomarkers.

Alessandra Gavazza, Alessandro Fruganti, Vanessa Turinelli, Andrea Marchegiani, Andrea Spaterna, Beniamino Tesei, Giacomo Rossi, Matteo Cerquetella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alessandra GavazzaSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
Alessandro FrugantiSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
Vanessa TurinelliIDEXX Laboratories-Italia S.r.l, Milan, Italy.
Andrea MarchegianiSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
Andrea SpaternaSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
Beniamino TeseiSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
Giacomo RossiSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
Matteo CerquetellaSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In small animals, cardiac disease evaluation through laboratory tests can be a challenge. This review will present both historical and updated perspectives on the clinical pathology of cardiac diseases in dogs and demonstrate that laboratory tests are useful tools for the management of patients with cardiac diseases.

Indexed as

biomarkercardiac diseasedoglaboratory testreview

Identifiers

PMID32676505
PMCPMC7333565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.