Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32676465›Full record

ArticlePreventive nutrition and food science2020

Food Security and Its Association with Social Support in the Rural Households: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Amin Mokari-Yamchi, Ayoub Faramarzi, Ammar Salehi-Sahlabadi, Meisam Barati, Delaram Ghodsi, Masoumeh Jabbari, Azita Hekmatdoost

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive nutrition and food science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amin Mokari-YamchiStudent Research Committee, Department of Community Nutrition, Research Institute Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1981619573, Iran.
Ayoub FaramarziStatistical Research Center, Statistical Center of Iran, Tehran 1414663111, Iran.
Ammar Salehi-SahlabadiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Research Institute Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1981619573, Iran.
Meisam BaratiCellular and Molecular Nutrition, Research Institute Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1981619573, Iran.
Delaram GhodsiNutrition Research, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology, Research Institute Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1981619573, Iran.
Masoumeh JabbariStudent Research Committee, Department of Community Nutrition, Research Institute Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1981619573, Iran.
Azita HekmatdoostDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Research Institute Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1981619573, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food insecurity is a major and multidimensional global problem, particularly in rural and vulnerable areas. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to identify the relationship between social support and food insecurity in 404 Iranian rural households. We selected the sample by cluster random sampling and collected data using three questionnaires [demographic, Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale (MSPSS), and United States Department of Agriculture food security questionnaires] and analyzed data using chi-square tests and logistic regression (using SPSS version 19.0). Of the 404 Iranian households, 168 (41.6%) were classified as food secure. The logistic regression analysis revealed that education and job status of the household heads and household income were significantly associated with food security status. Additionally, perceived social support was protective against food insecurity after adjusting for confounding factors [compared with the first quartile, second quartile odds ratio (OR)=1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94∼3.3 and fourth quartile OR=2.21, 95% CI: 1.13∼4.33]. This study indicated that social support contributes to a reduced chance of food insecurity in rural households. These results suggest that policy makers should focus on strengthening social support in vulnerable communities to help protect against hunger and poverty.

Indexed as

food securitylogistic regressionrural householdssocial support

Identifiers

PMID32676465
PMCPMC7333000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.