ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2020
Current techniques of prostate biopsy: an update from past to present.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Standalone 29-MHz micro-ultrasound for classifying clinically significant prostate cancer: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of prospective studies.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- Development of a quantitative multiparametric ultrasound and deep learning classifier for the detection of prostate cancer.European radiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Three-Dimensional Shear-Wave Viscoelastographic Estimation by System Identification for Prostate Cancer Localization.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2025Article
- Comparative Performance of the CamPROBE Local Anaesthetic Transperineal Biopsy Device Versus an In-Line Device for Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Stress testing deep learning models for prostate cancer detection on biopsies and surgical specimens.The Journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Review
- Machine learning discrimination of Gleason scores below GG3 and above GG4 for HSPC patients diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of prostate cancer detection using micro-ultrasound versus MRI through co-registration to whole-mount pathology.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Current Approach to Complications and Difficulties during Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Imaging of clinically silent rectoprostatic hematoma in MRI guided in-bore prostate biopsy.Scientific reports · 2022Observational
- Construction and Validation of a Robust Cancer Stem Cell-Associated Gene Set-Based Signature to Predict Early Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer.Disease markers · 2020Article
- Transperineal versus Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Cancer Detection and Complication Rates.Current health sciences journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Knowing the demerits of the transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy has led to a shift in the general techniques and technology of the prostate biopsy. In addition, the advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sensitivity and the evidence from the PROMIS trial about its ability to detect clinically significant tumours encourage urologists and industry to implement MRI-guided targeted biopsy. However, the science is still looking how to improve safety and increase its cancer detection rate (CDR).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.