ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2020
Development and validation of an integrative methylation signature and nomogram for predicting survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Competitive Risk Model in Elderly Patients With Chromophobe Cell Renal Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study.Frontiers in public health · 2022Trial
- Unraveling the molecular landscape of clear cell renal cell carcinoma through integrative transcriptomic analysis and validation using clinical samples.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Construction and Validation of Protein Expression-related Prognostic Models in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of Cancer · 2023Article
- The Role of Epigenetics in the Progression of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and the Basis for Future Epigenetic Treatments.Cancers · 2021Review
- Article
- Nomograms-based prediction of overall and cancer-specific survivals for patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGrowing evidence has shown that genetic or epigenetic alterations are highly involved in the initiation and progression of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study aimed to find prognostic methylation markers in clear cell RCC (ccRCC).
methodsIn this study, we developed and confirmed an integrated and comprehensive methylation signature by integrating DNA methylation, gene expression, and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) survival data. First, the methylation signature was found and checked based on data analysis of published datasets. Then, independent predictive factors were selected using the Cox proportional model and incorporated into the nomogram. Finally, the predictive nomogram was derived and validated using a concordance index and calibration plots.
resultsA series of differentially expressed and methylated genes were identified. After intersection analysis, Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis, and correlation analysis, FCGR1A, F2, and NOD2 were established as a predictive signature. According to the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the risk score system based on the predictive signature was able to stratify the patients into high- and low-risk groups with significantly different overall survival. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis further showed that the predictive signature yielded high sensitivity and specificity in predicting the prognosis outcome of ccRCC patients. Moreover, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that the three-gene methylation signature was an independent prognostic factor in ccRCC. Finally, a nomogram comprising the predictive signature and several independent variables were constructed and proved to effectively predict ccRCC patient survival.
conclusionsThe three-gene methylation signature was revealed to be a potential novel and independent adverse predictor of prognosis for ccRCC patients and may serve as a promising marker for treatment management and survival outcome improvement. However, substantial validation experiments are required to characterize the molecular background of the predictive signature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.