Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32676319›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2020

Predicting EGFR mutation subtypes in lung adenocarcinoma using

Qiufang Liu, Dazhen Sun, Nan Li, Jinman Kim, Dagan Feng, Gang Huang, Lisheng Wang, Shaoli Song

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ExplainableJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Clinical application ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Qiufang LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Dazhen SunSJTU-USYD Joint Research Alliance for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Nan LiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jinman KimSJTU-USYD Joint Research Alliance for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Dagan FengSJTU-USYD Joint Research Alliance for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Gang HuangSJTU-USYD Joint Research Alliance for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Lisheng WangSJTU-USYD Joint Research Alliance for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Shaoli SongDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences · CNUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation types is crucial before tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment. Radiomics is a new strategy to noninvasively predict the genetic status of cancer. In this study, we aimed to develop a predictive model based on

methodsWe retrospectively studied

resultsTwo sets of prognostic radiomic features were found for specific EGFR mutation subtypes: 5 radiomic features for EGFR exon 19 deletions, and 5 radiomic features for EGFR exon 21 L858R missense. The corresponding radiomic predictors achieved the prediction accuracies of 0.77 and 0.92 in terms of AUC, respectively. Combing these two predictors, the overall model for predicting EGFR mutation positivity was also constructed, and the AUC was 0.87.

conclusionsIn our study, we established predictive models based on radiomic analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT images. And it achieved a satisfying prediction power in the identification of EGFR mutation status as well as the certain EGFR mutation subtypes in lung cancer.

Indexed as

18F-FDG PET/CTEGFR mutation subtypesLung adenocarcinomapredictionradiomic features

Identifiers

PMID32676319
PMCPMC7354146
OpenAlexW3033149371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.