ArticlePeerJ2020
Effects of microbial evolution dominate those of experimental host-mediated indirect selection.
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel artificial selection method improves function of simulated microbial communities.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Selection and transmission of the gut microbiome alone can shift mammalian behavior.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The success of artificial selection for collective composition hinges on initial and target values.eLife · 2025Article
- Artificial selection improves pollutant degradation by bacterial communities.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Top-down and bottom-up microbiome engineering approaches to enable biomanufacturing from waste biomass.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Review
- The effectiveness of artificial microbial community selection: a conceptual framework and a meta-analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- A Functional Analysis of the Purine Salvage Pathway in Acetobacter fabarum.Journal of bacteriology · 2022Article
- Experimental inheritance of antibiotic acquired dysbiosis affects host phenotypes across generations.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Artificial Selection on Microbiomes To Breed Microbiomes That Confer Salt Tolerance to Plants.mSystems · 2021Article
- Steering ecological-evolutionary dynamics to improve artificial selection of microbial communities.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Engineering complex communities by directed evolution.Nature ecology & evolution · 2021Article
- Experimental evolution can enhance benefits of rhizobia to novel legume hosts.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Directed Evolution of Microbial Communities.Annual review of biophysics · 2021Review
- Emerging strategies for precision microbiome management in diverse agroecosystems.Nature plants · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbes ubiquitously inhabit animals and plants, often affecting their host's phenotype. As a result, even in a constant genetic background, the host's phenotype may evolve through indirect selection on the microbiome. 'Microbiome engineering' offers a promising novel approach for attaining desired host traits but has been attempted only a few times. Building on the known role of the microbiome on development in fruit flies, we attempted to evolve earlier-eclosing flies by selecting on microbes in the growth media. We carried out parallel evolution experiments in no- and high-sugar diets by transferring media associated with fast-developing fly lines over the course of four selection cycles. In each cycle, we used sterile eggs from the same inbred population, and assayed mean fly eclosion times. Ultimately, flies eclosed seven to twelve hours earlier, depending on the diet, but microbiome engineering had no effect relative to a random-selection control treatment. 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed that the microbiome did evolve, particularly in the no sugar diet, with an increase in Shannon diversity over time. Thus, while microbiome evolution did affect host eclosion times, these effects were incidental. Instead, any experimentally enforced selection effects were swamped by uncontrolled microbial evolution, likely resulting in its adaptation to the media. These results imply that selection on host phenotypes must be strong enough to overcome other selection pressures simultaneously operating on the microbiome. The independent evolutionary trajectories of the host and the microbiome may limit the extent to which indirect selection on the microbiome can ultimately affect host phenotype. Random-selection lines accounting for independent microbial evolution are essential for experimental microbiome engineering studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.