Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32676104›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2020

Performance Status Is a Predictive Factor of Improvement after Colonic Stenting in Patients with Malignant Stenosis due to Extraparenteral Malignant Tumors.

Yasutoshi Shiratori, Naoki Ishii, Takashi Ikeya, Koichi Takagi, Kenji Nakamura, Katsuyuki Fukuda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yasutoshi ShiratoriDepartment of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7784-6210
Naoki IshiiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Shinagawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4876-1063
Takashi IkeyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4838-2207
Koichi TakagiDepartment of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Dental University Ichikawa General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6411-4475
Katsuyuki FukudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6273-4227
St. Luke's International Hospital · JPNew Tokyo Hospital · JPTokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic stenting with self-expandable metallic stents is widely accepted for the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction. Generally, stenting is performed as a bridge-to-surgery for primary colorectal cancer (CRC). Furthermore, palliative colonic stenting is performed for extraparenteral malignant tumors (EPMTs). However, predictive factors for improving clinical outcomes after colonic stenting for EPMTs remain unclear. This study is aimed at evaluating patients with EPMTs who underwent colonic stenting and investigating factors influencing clinical improvement after the stenting procedure. Twenty-one patients with colorectal obstruction by EPMTs were treated using self-expandable metallic stents over a period of 8 years. We divided the enrolled patients into the clinically improved and nonimproved groups after colonic stenting. Variables, including age; sex; type of primary cancer; serum albumin level; location of the obstruction; stent type, length, and diameter; prior chemotherapy treatment; ascites; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS); technical and clinical success rates; stent-related adverse events; and mortality rates, were evaluated. Technical failure was not observed in all cases. Clinical success, defined as the passage of stool and improvement in the colorectal obstruction scoring system (CROSS) without adverse events, was observed in the 14 patients. Univariate analyses revealed no significant differences in factors other than PS before stenting (

Identifiers

PMID32676104
PMCPMC7336230
OpenAlexW3038006295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.