Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32676006›Full record

ReviewClinical proteomics2020

Using phosphoproteomics data to understand cellular signaling: a comprehensive guide to bioinformatics resources.

Sara R Savage, Bing Zhang

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical proteomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pathway and Kinase Analysis in Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics with rROMA.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A web portal for exploring kinase-substrate interactions.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara R SavageDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN USA.
Bing ZhangLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8676-2425

Funding

Vanderbilt Biomedical Informatics Training ProgramT15LM007450 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jessica S. Ancker, Bradley A. Malin · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
iPGDAC, An Integrative Proteogenomic Data Analysis Center for CPTACU24CA210954 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ZHANG, BING · 2016 to 2020
$4.9M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA210954NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics is becoming an essential methodology for the study of global cellular signaling. Numerous bioinformatics resources are available to facilitate the translation of phosphopeptide identification and quantification results into novel biological and clinical insights, a critical step in phosphoproteomics data analysis. These resources include knowledge bases of kinases and phosphatases, phosphorylation sites, kinase inhibitors, and sequence variants affecting kinase function, and bioinformatics tools that can predict phosphorylation sites in addition to the kinase that phosphorylates them, infer kinase activity, and predict the effect of mutations on kinase signaling. However, these resources exist in silos and it is challenging to select among multiple resources with similar functions. Therefore, we put together a comprehensive collection of resources related to phosphoproteomics data interpretation, compared the use of tools with similar functions, and assessed the usability from the standpoint of typical biologists or clinicians. Overall, tools could be improved by standardization of enzyme names, flexibility of data input and output format, consistent maintenance, and detailed manuals.

Indexed as

Bioinformatics toolsKinasePhosphoproteomicsPhosphorylationSignaling

Identifiers

PMID32676006
PMCPMC7353784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.