ReviewActa Cardiologica Sinica2020
Sensing and Detection Functions in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.
Review in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Computational Journey Toward an Optimal Design for Metamaterial Epicardial Passive Sleeves.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Catastrophic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Misclassification of Ventricular Tachycardia.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2024Article
- A single-beat algorithm to discriminate farfield from nearfield bipolar voltage electrograms from the pulmonary veins.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023Article
- Radial and Circumferential CMR-Based RV Strain Predicts Low R Wave Amplitude after ICD Implantation in Patients with Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Choque inapropiado en DAI por estimulación nerviosa eléctrica transcutánea.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2022Article
- Successful Identification of and Discrimination Between Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmia with the Aid of Pacing and Defibrillator Devices.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2021Review
- A Shocking Case of Far-Field Atrial Oversensing in Giant-Cell Myocarditis.JACC. Case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators are small devices that have been proven to be beneficial by preventing sudden cardiac death, whether in primary or secondary prevention. Appropriate functioning of implantable cardioverter defibrillators is mainly dependent on the "good" sensing of ventricular electrogram waves, allowing for the adequate detection of ventricular arrhythmias in order to deliver appropriate therapy of either antitachycardia pacing or by delivering a shock according to the detected rhythm. Basic sensing function in defibrillators is based on detection rate and detection duration; additional parameters that are involved in the process of adequate detection include ventricular electrogram sensing, auto-adjusting sensitivity, supraventricular arrhythmia discrimination criteria, noise detection, and various dedicated algorithms. Defective sensing may result in the delivery of inappropriate therapy (oversensing) or inappropriate withholding of therapy (undersensing); the latter of which may lead to sudden cardiac death. This paper describes different clinical scenarios and programming tips to avoid abnormal or critical clinical situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.