Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32675481›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2020

Radiological Simultaneous Portohepatic Vein Embolization (RASPE) Before Major Hepatectomy: A Better Way to Optimize Liver Hypertrophy Compared to Portal Vein Embolization.

Christophe Laurent, Benjamin Fernandez, Arthur Marichez, Jean-Philippe Adam, Panteleimon Papadopoulos, Bruno Lapuyade, Laurence Chiche

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Initial experience with Double-vein Embolization in Hungary.European journal of radiology open · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christophe LaurentDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Haut Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France.
Benjamin FernandezDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Haut Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France.
Arthur MarichezDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Haut Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France.
Jean-Philippe AdamDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Haut Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France.
Panteleimon PapadopoulosDepartment of Radiology, Haut Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France.
Bruno LapuyadeDepartment of Radiology, Haut Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France.
Laurence ChicheDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Haut Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque · FRBordeaux Population Health · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this retrospective study was to compare portal vein embolization (PVE) and radiologica simultaneous portohepatic vein embolization (RASPE) for future liver remnant (FLR) growth in terms of feasibility, safety, and efficacy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: After portal vein embolization (PVE), 15% of patients remain ineligible for hepatic resection due to insufficient hypertrophy of the FLR. RASPE has been proposed to induce FLR growth. MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween 2016 and 2018, 73 patients were included in the study. RASPE was proposed for patients with a ratio of FLR to total liver volume (FLR/TLV) of <25% (RASPE group). This group was compared to patients who underwent PVE for a FLR/TLV <30% (PVE group). Patients in the 2 groups were matched for age, sex, type of tumor, and number of chemotherapy treatments. FLR was assessed by computed tomography before and 4 weeks after the procedure.

resultsThe technical success rate in both groups was 100%. Morbidity post-embolization, and the time between embolization and surgery were similar between the groups. In the PVE group, the FLR/TLV ratio before embolization was 31.03% (range: 18.33%-38.95%) versus 22.91% (range: 16.55-32.15) in the RASPE group (P < 0.0001). Four weeks after the procedure, the liver volume increased by 28.98% (range: 9.31%-61.23%) in the PVE group and by 61.18% (range: 23.18%-201.56%) in the RASPE group (P < 0.0001). Seven patients in the PVE group, but none in the RASPE group, had postoperative liver failure (P = 0.012).

conclusionsRASPE can be considered as "radiological associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy." RASPE induced safe and profound growth of the FLR and was more efficient than PVE. RASPE also allowed for extended hepatectomy with less risk of post-operative liver failure.

Indexed as

AgedChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleFranceHepatectomyHepatomegalyHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePortal VeinPreoperative Care

Identifiers

PMID32675481
OpenAlexW3027431503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.