Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32675463›Full record

ReviewEndoscopic ultrasound

Do we need contrast agents for EUS?

Adrian Saftoiu, Bertrand Napoleon, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Barbara Braden, Sean Burmeister, Silvia Carrara, Xin Wu Cui, Pietro Fusaroli, Uwe Gottschalk, Michael Hocke and 19 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Contrast-enhanced guided endoscopic ultrasound procedures.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Controversies in EUS.Endoscopic ultrasound
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.

Adrian SaftoiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Bertrand NapoleonDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Hopital Privé J Mermoz Ramsay Générale de Santé, Lyon, France.
Paolo Giorgio ArcidiaconoPancreatico/Biliary Endoscopy & Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Barbara BradenJohann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany; Translational Gastroenterology Unit I John Radcliffe Hospital I Oxford OX3 9DU UK.
Sean BurmeisterSurgical Gastroenterology unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Silvia CarraraDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy.
Xin Wu CuiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, China.
Pietro FusaroliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Bologna/Imola Hospital, Imola, Italy.
Uwe GottschalkDepartment of Medical, Dietrich Bonhoeffer Klinikum, Neubrandenburg, Germany.
Michael HockeMedical Department, Helios Klinikum Meiningen, Germany.
Stephan HollerbachDepartment of Gastroenterology, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Celle, Celle, Germany.
Julio Iglesias-GarciaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Christian JenssenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg/Wriezen; Brandenburg Institute of Clinical Ultrasound, Medical University Brandenburg, Neuruppin, Germany.
Masayuki KitanoSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Alberto LarghiDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Kofi W OppongHPB Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Anand V SahaiCenter Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Siyu SunEndoscopy Center, ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning province, China.
Eike BurmesterSana Kliniken Lübeck, Germany.
Milena Di LeoDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy.
Maria Chiara PetronePancreatico/Biliary Endoscopy & Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Erwin SantosDepartment of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Anthony Y B TeohDepartment of Surgery, The Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China.
Joo Ha HwangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Mihai RimbasGastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital Internal Medicine Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine Bucharest, Romania.
Malay SharmaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jaswant Rai Speciality Hospital, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rajesh PuriInterventional Gastroenterology, Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences Medanta the Medicity Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Michel KahalehDepartment of Gastroenterology, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey, USA.
Christoph F DietrichJohann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, China; Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Kliniken Hirslanden, Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Bern, Switzerland.
Humanitas University · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAllgemeines Krankenhaus Celle · DECarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAChina Medical University · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · CNDietrich Bonhoeffer Klinikum · DEFreeman Hospital · GBGénérale de Santé · FRGoethe University Frankfurt · DEGroote Schuur Hospital · ZAHelios Vogtland Klinikum Plauen · DEHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNJaswant Rai Speciality Hospital · INJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBMedanta The Medicity · INMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DERutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recently introduced a series of articles that dealt with controversies in EUS. In Part I, the authors discussed which clinical information is necessary prior to EUS and whether other imaging modalities are required before embarking on EUS examinations. Part II focuses on technical details and controversies about the use of EUS in special situations. In this article, important practical issues regarding the application of contrast-enhanced EUS in various clinical settings are raised and controversially discussed from different points of view.

Indexed as

contrast agentscontrast enhacementguidelinespancreas

Identifiers

PMID32675463
PMCPMC7811706
OpenAlexW3041871177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.