Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32675328›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2021

Changing hospital organisational culture for improved patient outcomes: developing and implementing the leadership saves lives intervention.

Erika Linnander, Zahirah McNatt, Kasey Boehmer, Emily Cherlin, Elizabeth Bradley, Leslie Curry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erika LinnanderGlobal Health Leadership Initiative, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA erika.linnander@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3417-1049
Zahirah McNattUniversity of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.
Kasey BoehmerKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Emily CherlinGlobal Health Leadership Initiative, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Elizabeth BradleyVassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York, USA.
Leslie CurryGlobal Health Leadership Initiative, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3419-4654

Funding

NCATS NIH HHS L30 TR002972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeadership Saves Lives (LSL) was a prospective, mixed methods intervention to promote positive change in organisational culture across 10 diverse hospitals in the USA and reduce mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Despite the potential impact of complex interventions such as LSL, descriptions in the peer-reviewed literature often lack the detail required to allow adoption and adaptation of interventions or synthesis of evidence across studies. Accordingly, here we present the underlying design principles, overall approach to intervention design and core content of the intervention. METHODS OF INTERVENTION DEVELOPMENT: Hospitals were selected for participation from the membership of the Mayo Clinic Care Network using random sampling with a purposeful component. The intervention was designed based on the Assess, Innovate, Develop, Engage, Devolve model for diffusion of innovation, with attention to pressure testing of the intervention with user groups, creation of a think tank to develop a comprehensive assessment of the landscape, and early and continued engagement with strategically identified stakeholders in multiple arenas.

resultsWe provide in-depth descriptions of the design and delivery of the three intervention components (three annual meetings of all hospitals, four rounds of in-hospital workshops and an online community), designed to equip a guiding coalition within each site to identify and address root causes of AMI mortality and improve organisational culture.

conclusionsThis detailed practical description of the intervention may be useful for healthcare practitioners seeking to promote organisational culture change in their own contexts, researchers seeking to compare the results of the intervention with other leadership development and organisational culture change efforts, and healthcare professionals committed to understanding complex interventions across healthcare settings.

Indexed as

LeadershipOrganizational CultureHospitalsHumansOrganizational InnovationProspective Studieshealthcare quality improvementhealth professions educationimplementation scienceleadershipteamwork

Identifiers

PMID32675328
PMCPMC8142460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.