Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32675172›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2020

Influence of guideline adherence and parameter control on the clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Jingru Lu, Wei Zhao, Tingyu Chen, Zhuoyang Xu, Xingzhi Sun, Honglang Xie, Yu An, Caihong Zeng, Gang Hu, Guotong Xie and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jingru Lu *School of Medicine, Southeast University, National Clinical Research Center of Kidney Diseases, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Wei Zhao *Department of Intelligent Clinical Decision Support, Ping An Healthcare Technology, Beijing, China.
Tingyu ChenNational Clinical Research Center of Kidney Diseases, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Zhuoyang XuDepartment of Intelligent Clinical Decision Support, Ping An Healthcare Technology, Beijing, China.
Xingzhi SunDepartment of Intelligent Clinical Decision Support, Ping An Healthcare Technology, Beijing, China.
Honglang XieNational Clinical Research Center of Kidney Diseases, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Yu AnNational Clinical Research Center of Kidney Diseases, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Caihong ZengNational Clinical Research Center of Kidney Diseases, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Gang HuDepartment of Intelligent Clinical Decision Support, Ping An Healthcare Technology, Beijing, China.
Guotong XieDepartment of Intelligent Clinical Decision Support, Ping An Healthcare Technology, Beijing, China.
Zhihong LiuSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, National Clinical Research Center of Kidney Diseases, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China liuzhihong@nju.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6093-0726
Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNPing An (China)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe assessed the association between guideline adherence and outcomes of clinical parameter control and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and further studied the effect of parameter control on ESKD for Chinese patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, 1128 patients with DN (15,374 patient-visit samples) diagnosed by renal biopsy were enrolled. Samples were classified as adherence and nonadherence based on whether prescribed drugs conformed to medication regimen and drug contraindication recommended by guidelines, including American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Chinese guidelines. Guideline adherence rate was calculated on all samples for antihyperglycemic, antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatments. Clinical parameter control was compared after 3-6 months' therapy between two groups by generalized estimating equation models. Time-dependent Cox models were applied to evaluate the influence of guideline adherence on ESKD. Latent class mixed model was used to identify distinct trajectories for parameters and their ESKD risks were compared using Cox proportional-hazards models.

resultsGuideline adherence rate of antihyperglycemic therapy was the highest, with 72.87% and 68.15% of samples meeting ADA and Chinese guidelines, respectively. Adherence was more likely to have good glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) control (ADA: OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.88; Chinese guideline: OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.85) and good blood pressure control (ADA: OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.78; Chinese guideline: OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.79) compared with nonadherence. The improvement of patient's adherence showed the potential to reduce ESKD risk. For proteinuria, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), systolic blood pressure and uric acid, patients in higher-value trajectory group had higher ESKD risk. Proteinuria and LDL-C trajectories were most closely related to ESKD risk, while the risk was not significantly different in HbA1c trajectories.

conclusionsGuideline adherence and good control of proteinuria and LDL-C in clinical practice are important and in need for improving clinical outcomes in patients with DN.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic NephropathiesGlycated HemoglobinGuideline AdherenceHumansHypoglycemic AgentsRetrospective StudiesGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic Agentsclinical outcomediabetic nephropathyguideline adherencelongitudinal trajectoryparameter control

Identifiers

PMID32675172
PMCPMC7368486
OpenAlexW3043460816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.