Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32675143›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2020

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Update on diagnosis and management.

Benjamin R Wakerley, Susan P Mollan, Alexandra J Sinclair

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Topiramate Versus Acetazolamide for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. A Real-World Data-Based Multicenter Retrospective Study.Indian journal of pharmaceutical education : official publication of Association of Pharmaceutical Teachers of India · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Correlation between lumbar puncture opening pressure and venous sinus pressure gradient in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin R WakerleyGloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK.
Susan P MollanUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Alexandra J SinclairUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK and University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK a.b.sinclair@bham.ac.uk.
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBGloucestershire Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0501747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is a condition of raised intracranial pressure of unknown cause. Features include new onset headache, which is frequently non-specific; papilloedema is present, visual disturbances are common; and there may be sixth nerve palsy. Diagnosis includes brain imaging with venography to exclude structural causes and venous sinus thrombosis. Lumbar puncture reveals pressure greater than 250 mmCSF with normal constituents. Treatments aim to modify the disease, prevent permanent visual loss and manage headaches. These include weight loss. For those with rapid visual decline, urgent surgical intervention is essential. For most, this is a chronic condition characterised by significantly disabling headaches.

Indexed as

Intracranial HypertensionPseudotumor CerebriHeadacheHumansSpinal PunctureWeight LossheadacheIdiopathic intracranial hypertensionobesitypapilloedemaraised intracranial pressure

Identifiers

PMID32675143
PMCPMC7385768
OpenAlexW3042916370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.