Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32675015›Full record

Trial reportClinical genitourinary cancer2021

A Phase 2 Trial of Abiraterone Followed by Randomization to Addition of Dasatinib or Sunitinib in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Nicholas Spetsieris, Myrto Boukovala, Justin A Weldon, Alexandros Tsikkinis, Anh Hoang, Ana Aparicio, Shi-Ming Tu, John C Araujo, Amado J Zurita, Paul G Corn and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The 2021 COVID-19 Artificial Intelligence Issue.Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas SpetsierisDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Myrto BoukovalaDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Justin A WeldonDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Alexandros TsikkinisDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Anh HoangDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ana AparicioDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Shi-Ming TuDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
John C AraujoDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Amado J ZuritaDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Paul G CornDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Lance PagliaroDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jeri KimDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jennifer WangDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Sumit K SubudhiDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Nizar M TannirDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Christopher J LogothetisDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Patricia TroncosoDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Xuemei WangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Sijin WenDepartment of Biostatistics, West Virginia University School of Public Health, Morgantown, WV.
Eleni EfstathiouDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: eefstathiou@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Laura F. Gibson · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResistance to novel androgen signaling inhibition and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progression is likely dependent on tumor microenvironment interactions. The Src pathway and neoangiogenesis have been implicated in prostate cancer progression. We studied the effect of adding the targeted agents dasatinib and sunitinib to abiraterone acetate (AA) in men with mCRPC. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this open-label randomized phase 2 study, mCRPC patients received AA. At resistance to AA, they were randomized 1:1 to combination with dasatinib or sunitinib. At second progression, patients crossed over. The primary end point was time to treatment failure (TTF), defined as time to progression or death. Secondary end points included overall survival and safety.

resultsFrom March 2011 to February 2015, a total of 179 patients were enrolled and 132 subsequently randomized. Median TTF was 5.7 months in the dasatinib group and 5.5 months in the sunitinib group. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of TTF (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-1.22). Median overall survival from study entry was 26.3 months in the dasatinib group and 27.7 months in the sunitinib group (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.47). Grade 3 or higher adverse events related to study medication were more frequent with sunitinib (n = 44, 46%) compared to dasatinib (n = 26, 24%). At data cutoff, 7 patients were experiencing a continuous response to AA, with a median duration of treatment of 5.7 years.

conclusionThere is no difference in overall survival and TTF between dasatinib and sunitinib combined with abiraterone in the treatment of patients with bone mCRPC.

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAbiraterone AcetateAndrostenesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDasatinibHumansMalePrednisoneRandom AllocationSunitinibTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentabirateroneAbiraterone AcetateAndrostenesDasatinibPrednisoneSunitinibAndrogen-signaling inhibitionNeoangiogenesisSrc pathwayTargeted agentsTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID32675015
PMCPMC10014037
OpenAlexW3029830108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.