Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32674517›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Multimodality Imaging in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Endocarditis and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Infection.

Nicola Galea, Francesco Bandera, Chiara Lauri, Camillo Autore, Andrea Laghi, Paola Anna Erba

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Innovations in Imaging:Current cardiology reports · 2024
    Review
  6. The Role of theJournal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Nuclear Imaging in Infective Endocarditis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicola GaleaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4708-5120
Francesco BanderaHeart Failure Unit, Cardiology University Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Malan, 1, San Donato Milanese, 20097 Milan, Italy.
Chiara LauriNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0314-5059
Camillo AutoreDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Andrea LaghiRadiology Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3091-7819
Paola Anna ErbaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious cardiac condition, which includes a wide range of clinical presentations, with varying degrees of severity. The diagnosis is multifactorial and a proper characterization of disease requires the identification of the primary site of infection (usually the cardiac valve) and the search of secondary systemic complications. Early depiction of local complications or distant embolization has a great impact on patient management and prognosis, as it may induce to aggressive antibiotic treatment or, in more advanced cases, cardiac surgery. In this setting, the multimodality imaging has assumed a pivotal role in the clinical decision making and it requires the physician to be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging technique. Echocardiography is the first imaging test, but it has several limitations. Therefore, the integration with other imaging modalities (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear imaging) becomes often necessary. Different strategies should be applied depending on whether the infection is suspected or already ascertained, whether located in native or prosthetic valves, in the left or right chambers, or if it involves an implanted cardiac device. In addition, detection of extracardiac IE-related lesions is crucial for a correct management and treatment. The aim of this review is to illustrate strengths and weaknesses of the various methods in the most common clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

computed tomographyechocardiographyendocarditis teamInfective endocarditismagnetic resonance imagingmultimodality imagingnuclear imagingpositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID32674517
PMCPMC7408824
OpenAlexW3042866102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.