Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32674463›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Reproducibility and Validity of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Dietary Assessment in Adolescents in a Self-Reported Way.

Leyre Notario-Barandiaran, Carmen Freire, Manuela García-de-la-Hera, Laura Mª Compañ-Gabucio, Laura Torres-Collado, Sandra González-Palacios, Antonio Mundo, Marina Molina, Mariana F Fernández, Jesús Vioque

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk assessment of food contact materials.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Leyre Notario-BarandiaranAlicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research, ISABIAL-UMH, 03010-Alicante, Spain.
Carmen FreireSpanish Consortium for Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28009 Madrid, Spain.
Manuela García-de-la-HeraAlicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research, ISABIAL-UMH, 03010-Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5742-2704
Laura Mª Compañ-GabucioAlicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research, ISABIAL-UMH, 03010-Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5324-1535
Laura Torres-ColladoAlicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research, ISABIAL-UMH, 03010-Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2842-1344
Sandra González-PalaciosAlicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research, ISABIAL-UMH, 03010-Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3358-472X
Antonio MundoInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18012 Granada, Spain.
Marina MolinaInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18012 Granada, Spain.
Mariana F FernándezSpanish Consortium for Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28009 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6417-8914
Jesús VioqueAlicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research, ISABIAL-UMH, 03010-Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2284-148X
Instituto de investigación sanitaria y biomédica de AlicanteInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ESUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

"Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional" (ISCIII/FEDER) for the Miguel Servet Type I Program CP16/00085Instituto de Salud Carlos III FIS 07/0314Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI11/01007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tools to assess diet in a reliable and efficient way are needed, particularly in children and adolescents. In this study, we assess the reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) among adolescents in Spain. We analyzed data of 51 male adolescents aged 15-17 years from a prospective birth cohort study. Participants answered the FFQ twice in a self-administered way over a 12-month period. Reproducibility was assessed by comparing nutrient and food intakes from the FFQs, and validity by comparing nutrient intakes from the average of two FFQs and the average of two 24-Hour Dietary Recalls obtained in the period. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated. The average of reproducibility correlation coefficients for food group intakes was 0.33, with the highest correlation for vegetable intake (r = 0.81); and the average for nutrient intake was 0.32, with the highest coefficients for α- and β-carotene (r = 0.65). Validity correlation coefficients ranged from 0.07 for carbohydrates to 0.53 for dietary fiber. The average of the validity correlation coefficients was r = 0.32. This study suggests that our FFQ may be a useful tool for assessing dietary intake of most nutrient and food groups among Spanish male adolescents in a self-administered way, despite reproducibility and, particularly validity, being low for some nutrients and food groups.

Indexed as

Nutrition AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdolescent Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaCohort StudiesDiet RecordsEatingFeeding BehaviorHumansMaleNutrition SurveysReproducibility of ResultsSpainTime FactorsVegetablesadolescentdietdietary food recordfood frequency questionnaireMediterranean countrynutrient intakereproducibilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID32674463
PMCPMC7400888
OpenAlexW3043811694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.