Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32674439›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Impact of Chemotherapy in the Adjuvant Setting of Early Stage Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.

Alessandro Rizzo, Margherita Nannini, Annalisa Astolfi, Valentina Indio, Pierandrea De Iaco, Anna Myriam Perrone, Antonio De Leo, Lorena Incorvaia, Valerio Di Scioscio, Maria Abbondanza Pantaleo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cervical spine myxoid liposarcoma in a 30-year-old male: a rare case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Management and prognosis of uterine sarcoma in elderly.Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Targeting homologous recombination deficiency in uterine leiomyosarcoma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro RizzoDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, 40128 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5257-8678
Margherita NanniniMedical Oncology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40128 Bologna, Italy.
Annalisa AstolfiDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2732-0747
Valentina Indio"Giorgio Prodi" Cancer Research Center, University of Bologna, 40128 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8854-3821
Pierandrea De IacoGynecologic Oncology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40128 Bologna, Italy.
Anna Myriam PerroneGynecologic Oncology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40128 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3140-4772
Antonio De LeoPathology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40128 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3761-5135
Lorena IncorvaiaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, Palermo University Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy.
Valerio Di ScioscioRadiology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40128 Bologna, Italy.
Maria Abbondanza PantaleoDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, 40128 Bologna, Italy.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) appears to be increasing over the past few years, several clinical trials and previous meta-analyses failed to determine whether AC could improve clinical outcomes in uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare AC (with or without radiotherapy) versus observation (obs) after primary surgery in early stage uLMS. MATERIALS AND

methodsRandomized controlled (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRSs) were retrieved. Outcomes of interest were as follows: distant recurrence rate, locoregional recurrence rate and overall recurrence rate. Results about distant recurrence rate, locoregional recurrence rate and overall recurrence rate were compared by calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); ORs were combined with Mantel-Haenszel method.

resultsNine studies were included in the analysis, involving 545 patients (AC: 252, obs: 293). Compared with obs, AC did not reduce locoregional and distant recurrence rate, with a pooled OR of 1.36 and 0.63, respectively. Similarly, administration of AC did not decrease overall recurrence rate in comparison to obs.

conclusionAccording to our results, AC (with or without radiotherapy) did not decrease recurrence rate in early stage uLMS; thus, the role of AC in this setting remains unclear.

Indexed as

adjuvant therapychemotherapymeta-analysisuterine leiomyosarcomauterine sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID32674439
PMCPMC7409135
OpenAlexW3043776027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.