Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32674396›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Shale Gas Development and Community Distress: Evidence from England.

Feizel Aryee, Anna Szolucha, Paul B Stretesky, Damien Short, Michael A Long, Liesel A Ritchie, Duane A Gill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Feizel AryeeDepartment of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1010-0067
Anna SzoluchaDepartment of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8938-6066
Paul B StreteskyHealthy Living, Department of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8S, UK.
Damien ShortHuman Rights Consortium, School of Advanced Study, University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5897-2732
Michael A LongDepartment of Sociology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078-4062, USA.
Liesel A RitchieDepartment of Sociology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078-4062, USA.
Duane A GillDepartment of Sociology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078-4062, USA.
Northumbria University · GBOklahoma State University · USUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research examines psychosocial stress associated with shale gas development through the narratives of residents and the Revised Impact of Event Scale (IES-R). We carried out our research in three of England's communities impacted by shale gas development. To gather data, we conducted qualitative interviews and engaged in participant observation in all three communities and conducted a quantitative survey of residents. From our qualitative interviews it was apparent that the residents we spoke with experienced significant levels of stress associated with shale gas development in each community. Importantly, residents reported that stress was not only a reaction to development, but a consequence of interacting with industry and decision makers. Our quantitative findings suggest that a significant portion of residents 14.1% living near the shale gas sites reported high levels of stress (i.e., scoring 24 or more points) even while the mean IES-R score of residents living around the site is relatively low (i.e., 9.6; 95% CI 7.5-11.7). We conclude that the experiences, of the three English communities, reported in the qualitative interviews and quantitative survey are consistent with the reports of stress in the United States for those residents who live in shale gas communities. We therefore suggest that psychosocial stress is an important negative externality, which needs to be taken seriously by local planning officers and local planning committees when considering exploration and development permits for shale gas.

Indexed as

Natural GasStress, PsychologicalEnglandFemaleHumansMalePublic OpinionSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesNatural Gasfrackinghydraulic fracturingimpact of events scalemental healthshale gasstress

Identifiers

PMID32674396
PMCPMC7400381
OpenAlexW3042453422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.