Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32674392›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Benefits and Costs of a Community-Led Total Sanitation Intervention in Rural Ethiopia-A Trial-Based ex post Economic Evaluation.

Seungman Cha, Sunghoon Jung, Dawit Belew Bizuneh, Tadesse Abera, Young-Ah Doh, Jieun Seong, Ian Ross

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seungman ChaFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Disease, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Sunghoon JungGood Neighbors International, Mozambique, Maputo, Mozambique.
Dawit Belew BizunehIndependent Consultant, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tadesse AberaPublic Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Young-Ah DohKorea International Cooperation Agency, Seongnam 13449, Korea.
Jieun SeongKorea International Cooperation Agency, Seongnam 13449, Korea.
Ian RossFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Disease, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We estimated the costs and benefits of a community-led total sanitation (CLTS) intervention using the empirical results from a cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Ethiopia. We modelled benefits and costs of the intervention over 10 years, as compared to an existing local government program. Health benefits were estimated as the value of averted mortality due to diarrheal disease and the cost of illness arising from averted diarrheal morbidity. We also estimated the value of time savings from avoided open defecation and use of neighbours' latrines. Intervention delivery costs were estimated top-down based on financial records, while recurrent costs were estimated bottom-up from trial data. We explored methodological and parameter uncertainty using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Avoided mortality accounted for 58% of total benefits, followed by time savings from increased access to household latrines. The base case benefit-cost ratio was 3.7 (95% CI: 1.9-5.4) and the net present value was Int'l $1,193,786 (95% CI: 406,017-1,977,960). The sources of the largest uncertainty in one-way sensitivity analyses were the effect of the CLTS intervention and the assumed lifespan of an improved latrine. Our results suggest that CLTS interventions can yield favourable economic returns, particularly if follow-up after the triggering is implemented intensively and uptake of improved latrines is achieved (as opposed to unimproved).

Indexed as

SanitationToilet FacilitiesCost-Benefit AnalysisEthiopiaHealth StatusHumansModels, TheoreticalRural Populationcommunity-led total sanitationcost–benefit analysisEthiopiahousehold latrinesanitation improvements

Identifiers

PMID32674392
PMCPMC7399893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.