Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32674379›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Alzheimer's Disease, and Breast and Prostate Cancer Research: Translational Failures and the Importance to Monitor Outputs and Impact of Funded Research.

Francesca Pistollato, Camilla Bernasconi, Janine McCarthy, Ivana Campia, Christian Desaintes, Clemens Wittwehr, Pierre Deceuninck, Maurice Whelan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesca PistollatoEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Camilla BernasconiEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Janine McCarthyEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Ivana CampiaEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Christian DesaintesEuropean Commission, Directorate General for Research and Innovation (RTD), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Clemens WittwehrEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Pierre DeceuninckEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Maurice WhelanEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Joint Research Centre · ITEuropean Commission · BEPhysicians Committee for Responsible Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia and cancer are becoming increasingly prevalent in Western countries. In the last two decades, research focused on Alzheimer's disease (AD) and cancer, in particular, breast cancer (BC) and prostate cancer (PC), has been substantially funded both in Europe and worldwide. While scientific research outcomes have contributed to increase our understanding of the disease etiopathology, still the prevalence of these chronic degenerative conditions remains very high across the globe. By definition, no model is perfect. In particular, animal models of AD, BC, and PC have been and still are traditionally used in basic/fundamental, translational, and preclinical research to study human disease mechanisms, identify new therapeutic targets, and develop new drugs. However, animals do not adequately model some essential features of human disease; therefore, they are often unable to pave the way to the development of drugs effective in human patients. The rise of new technological tools and models in life science, and the increasing need for multidisciplinary approaches have encouraged many interdisciplinary research initiatives. With considerable funds being invested in biomedical research, it is becoming pivotal to define and apply indicators to monitor the contribution to innovation and impact of funded research. Here, we discuss some of the issues underlying translational failure in AD, BC, and PC research, and describe how indicators could be applied to retrospectively measure outputs and impact of funded biomedical research.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseanimal modelsbiomedical researchbreast cancercross-disciplinarityfundingindicatorsprostate cancertranslational failure

Identifiers

PMID32674379
PMCPMC7401638
OpenAlexW3043112581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.