Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32674281›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Autochtonous Strain

Monika Pogány Simonová, Ľubica Chrastinová, Andrea Lauková

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Effect of Supplementation withVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monika Pogány SimonováInstitute of Animal Physiology, Centre of Biosciences of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4-6, 04001 Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-0377-4672
Ľubica ChrastinováInstitute for Nutrition, National Agricultural and Food Centre, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Nitra-Lužianky, Slovakia.
Andrea LaukováInstitute of Animal Physiology, Centre of Biosciences of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4-6, 04001 Kosice, Slovakia.
Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKNational Agricultural and Food Centre · SK

Funding

Agentúra Ministerstva Školstva, Vedy, Výskumu a Športu SR VEGA 2/0006/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review evaluates and compares the effects achieved after application of rabbit-derived bacteriocin-producing strain

Indexed as

enterocinEnterococcus faeciumintestinal morphologymeat qualitymicrobiotaphagocytic activityrabbitserum biochemistryweight gain

Identifiers

PMID32674281
PMCPMC7401553
OpenAlexW3042732791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.