ArticleDNA repair2020
Deciphering the role of distinct DNA-PK phosphorylations at collapsed replication forks.
Article in DNA repair, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of cellular phosphoproteome datasets exploring phospho-signaling associated with the RNA-binding protein RAVER1.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Two distinct long-range synaptic complexes promote different aspects of end processing prior to repair of DNA breaks by non-homologous end joining.Molecular cell · 2023Article
- Kinome-wide screening uncovers a role for Bromodomain Protein 3 in DNA double-stranded break repair.DNA repair · 2023Article
- ATM antagonizes NHEJ proteins assembly and DNA-ends synapsis at single-ended DNA double strand breaks.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Activation of DNA-PK by hairpinned DNA ends reveals a stepwise mechanism of kinase activation.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It has recently been established that the marked sensitivity of ATM deficient cells to topoisomerase poisons like camptothecin (Cpt) results from unrestrained end-joining of DNA ends at collapsed replication forks that is mediated by the non-homologous end joining [NHEJ] pathway and results in the induction of copious numbers of genomic alterations, termed "toxic NHEJ". Ablation of core components of the NHEJ pathway reverses the Cpt sensitivity of ATM deficient cells, but inhibition of DNA-PKcs does not. Here, we show that complete ablation of DNA-PKcs partially reverses the Cpt sensitivity of ATM deficient cells; thus, ATM deficient cells lacking DNA-PKcs are more resistant to Cpt than cells expressing DNA-PKcs. However, the relative sensitivity of DNA-PKcs proficient ATM deficient cells is inversely proportional to DNA-PKcs expression levels. These data suggest that DNA-PK may phosphorylate an ATM target (that contributes to Cpt resistance), explaining partial rescue of Cpt sensitivity in cells expressing high levels of DNA-PKcs. Although crippling NHEJ function by mutagenic blockade of the critical ABCDE autophosphorylation sites in DNA-PKcs also sensitizes cells to Cpt, this sensitization apparently occurs by a distinct mechanism from ATM ablation because blockade of these sites actually rescues ATM deficient cells from toxic NHEJ. These data are consistent with autophosphorylation of the ABCDE sites (and not ATM mediated phosphorylation) in response to Cpt-induced damage. In contrast, blockade of S3205 (an ATM dependent phosphorylation site in DNA-PKcs) that minimally impacts NHEJ, increases Cpt sensitivity. In sum, these data suggest that ATM and DNA-PK cooperate to facilitate Cpt-induced DNA damage, and that ATM phosphorylation of S3205 facilitates appropriate repair at collapsed replication forks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.