ArticleNeuroscience letters2020
Different responses after intracerebral hemorrhage between young and early middle-aged mice.
Article in Neuroscience letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced precision in intracerebral hemorrhage modeling via methodological improvements and outcomes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intracranial Pressure Dysfunction Following Severe Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Middle-Aged Rats.Translational stroke research · 2023Article
- Animal models for the study of intracranial hematomas (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Review
- Analysis of characteristics of intracranial cavernous angioma and bleeding factors in middle-aged and elderly patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Analysis of Age-Dependent Transcriptomic Changes in Response to Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Mice.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Article
- Lamivudine improves cognitive decline in SAMP8 mice: Integrating in vivo pharmacological evaluation and network pharmacology.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Article
- Behavioral Assessment of Sensory, Motor, Emotion, and Cognition in Rodent Models of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Although aging is a major risk factor for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), there are very few studies comparing ICH pathology between young and early middle-aged mice. In this study, 8-month old mice (early middle-aged mice) were compared against 2-month old mice (young mice) in neurological and histological changes after ICH induction, such as body weight, lesion volume, astrocytic responses, and motor and cognitive functions. At day 8 after ICH, there was no significant difference in lesion volume between the two groups, and both groups did not exhibit significant cognitive decline, as assessed by spontaneous alternative Y-maze test. On the other hand, 8-month old mice showed delayed recovery from body weight loss, along with reduced astrocytic activation. Interestingly, in the two motor function tests (beam-walking test and corner turn test), 8-month old mice exhibited lower scores only in the beam-walking test, suggesting a partial disturbance in motor recovery after ICH. These results suggest that age-related differences in ICH pathology may already start to appear in early middle-aged brains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.