Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32673560›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

Testing the greater male variability phenomenon: male mountain chickadees exhibit larger variation in reversal learning performance compared with females.

Carrie L Branch, Benjamin R Sonnenberg, Angela M Pitera, Lauren M Benedict, Dovid Y Kozlovsky, Eli S Bridge, Vladimir V Pravosudov

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Living on the edge: the evolution of spatial cognition in food-caching chickadees.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carrie L BranchCornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
Benjamin R SonnenbergEcology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology Graduate Program, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Angela M PiteraEcology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology Graduate Program, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Lauren M BenedictEcology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology Graduate Program, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Dovid Y KozlovskyDepartment of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA.
Eli S BridgeEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
Vladimir V PravosudovEcology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology Graduate Program, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
University of Nevada, Reno · USCornell University · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USVillanova University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The greater male variability phenomenon predicts that males exhibit larger ranges of variation in cognitive performance compared with females; however, support for this pattern has come exclusively from studies of humans and lacks mechanistic explanation. Furthermore, the vast majority of the literature assessing sex differences in cognition is based on studies of humans and a few other mammals. In order to elucidate the underpinnings of cognitive variation and the potential for fitness consequences, we must investigate sex differences in cognition in non-mammalian systems as well. Here, we assess the performance of male and female food-caching birds on a spatial learning and memory task and a reversal spatial task to address whether there are sex differences in mean cognitive performance or in the range of variation in performance. For both tasks, male and female mean performance was similar across four years of testing; however, males did exhibit a wider range of variation in performance on the reversal spatial task compared with females. The implications for mate choice and sexual selection of cognitive abilities are discussed and future directions are suggested to aid in the understanding of sex-related cognitive variation.

Indexed as

CognitionAnimalsDiscrimination LearningFeeding BehaviorFemaleFoodMaleMemoryReversal LearningSex CharacteristicsSongbirdsSpatial Learningfood-cachinggreater male variabilityreversal cognitionsex differencesspatial cognition

Identifiers

PMID32673560
PMCPMC7423667
OpenAlexW3043693497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.