ArticlePloS one2020
Shoe feature recommendations for different running levels: A Delphi study.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Effects of Shoe Sole Thickness on Running Biomechanics and Economy: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine - open · 2026Pooled it
- Inconsistent Effects of Experience on Running Biomechanics May be Influenced by Study Heterogeneity and Classification Criteria: a Systematic Review and Proposal of a Revised Taxonomy.Sports medicine - open · 2025Pooled it
- Running shoes for preventing lower limb running injuries in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Adherence, motivational factors, and injury rates in runners using minimalist vs. conventional shoes: A cross-sectional study of 4719 Brazilian runners.Brazilian journal of physical therapy · 2026Article
- Review
- Exploring the effects of arch support height on badminton sidestep cutting using musculoskeletal modeling.PloS one · 2026Article
- Technologically advanced running shoes reduce biomechanical factors of running related injury risk.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of midsole gait in running shoes with various 3d printed biomimetic structure.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biomechanical Changes and the Time Course of Recovery in Lower Extremities of Recreational Runners Following a Simulated Treadmill Half-Marathon.Sports medicine - open · 2025Article
- Running Shoe Recommendations Based on Gait Analysis Improve Perceptions of Comfort, Performance and Injury Risk: A Single-Blind Randomised Crossover Trial.Translational sports medicine · 2025Article
- How does it feel to run in minimalist and advanced footwear technology shoes: A qualitative study involving male recreational runners.PloS one · 2025Article
- Trends and hotspots in running shoe research: a bibliometric study from 2005 to 2024.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Review
- Effects of shoe heel height on ankle dynamics in running.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prevalence and Risk Factors for Musculoskeletal Pain when Running During Pregnancy: A Survey of 3102 Women.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Influence of Torsional Stiffness in Badminton Footwear on Lower Limb Biomechanics.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2024Article
- Reliability of Xsens IMU-Based Lower Extremity Joint Angles during In-Field Running.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Towards functionally individualised designed footwear recommendation for overuse injury prevention: a scoping review.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Crossover gait in running and measuring foot inversion angle at initial foot strike: a front-view video analysis approach.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Changes in ankle work, foot work, and tibialis anterior activation throughout a long run.Journal of sport and health science · 2022Article
- Gender and leg-dominance differences in shoe properties and foot injuries in badminton: a cross-sectional survey.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Providing runners with footwear that match their functional needs has the potential to improve footwear comfort, enhance running performance and reduce the risk of overuse injuries. It is currently not known how footwear experts make decisions about different shoe features and their properties for runners of different levels. We performed a Delphi study in order to understand: 1) definitions of different runner levels, 2) which footwear features are considered important and 3) how these features should be prescribed for runners of different levels. Experienced academics, journalists, coaches, bloggers and physicians that examine the effects of footwear on running were recruited to participate in three rounds of a Delphi study. Three runner level definitions were refined throughout this study based on expert feedback. Experts were also provided a list of 20 different footwear features. They were asked which features were important and what the properties of those features should be. Twenty-four experts, most with 10+ years of experience, completed all three rounds of this study. These experts came to a consensus for the characteristics of three different running levels. They indicated that 12 of the 20 footwear features initially proposed were important for footwear design. Of these 12 features, experts came to a consensus on how to apply five footwear feature properties for all three different running levels. These features were: upper breathability, forefoot bending stiffness, heel-to-toe drop, torsional bending stiffness and crash pad. Interestingly, the experts were not able to come to a consensus on one of the most researched footwear features, rearfoot midsole hardness. These recommendations can provide a starting point for further biomechanical studies, especially for features that are considered as important, but have not yet been examined experimentally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.