ArticlePloS one2020
Predicting human body composition using a modified adaptive genetic algorithm with a novel selection operator.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimization of mine ventilation network feature graph.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChanges to human body composition reflect changes in health status to some extent. It has been recognized that these changes occur earlier than diseases. This means that a reasonable prediction of body composition helps to improve model users' health. To overcome the low accuracy and poor adaptability of existing human body composition prediction models and obtain higher efficiency, we proposed a novel method for predicting human body composition which uses a modified adaptive genetic algorithm (MAGA).
methodsFirstly, since there are many parameters for a human body composition model, and these parameters are associated, we designed a new parameter selection approach by combining the improved RReliefF method with the mRMR method. Following this, selected parameters were used to establish a model that fits body composition. Secondly, in order to accurately calculate the weight of parameters in this model, we proposed a solution which used a modified adaptive genetic algorithm, taking advantage of both roulette and optimum reservation strategies. This solution also has an improved selection operator. Thirdly, taking the percentage of body fat (PBF) as an example of body composition, we conducted experiments to compare performance between our algorithm and other algorithms.
resultsThrough our simulations, we demonstrated that the adaptability of the proposed model is 0.9921, the mean relative error is 0.05%, the mean square error is 1.3 and the correlation coefficient is 0.982. When compared with the indexes of other models, our model has the highest adaptability and the smallest error. Additionally, the suggested model, which has a training time of 28.58s and a running time of 2.84s, is faster than some models.
conclusionThe PBF prediction model established by MAGA has high accuracy, stronger generalization ability and higher efficiency, which could provide a new method for human composition prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.