Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32673314›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2020

Resection and repair of a Cas9 double-strand break at CTG trinucleotide repeats induces local and extensive chromosomal deletions.

Valentine Mosbach, David Viterbo, Stéphane Descorps-Declère, Lucie Poggi, Wilhelm Vaysse-Zinkhöfer, Guy-Franck Richard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Tips, Tricks, and Potential Pitfalls of CRISPR Genome Editing inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Homologous recombination within repetitive DNA.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  12. Structure-forming repeats and their impact on genome stability.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valentine MosbachInstitut Pasteur, CNRS, UMR3525, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5538-1061
David ViterboInstitut Pasteur, CNRS, UMR3525, Paris, France.
Stéphane Descorps-DeclèreInstitut Pasteur, CNRS, UMR3525, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2036-6176
Lucie PoggiInstitut Pasteur, CNRS, UMR3525, Paris, France.
Wilhelm Vaysse-ZinkhöferInstitut Pasteur, CNRS, UMR3525, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6734-1676
Guy-Franck RichardInstitut Pasteur, CNRS, UMR3525, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8233-3532
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsatellites are short tandem repeats, ubiquitous in all eukaryotes and represent ~2% of the human genome. Among them, trinucleotide repeats are responsible for more than two dozen neurological and developmental disorders. Targeting microsatellites with dedicated DNA endonucleases could become a viable option for patients affected with dramatic neurodegenerative disorders. Here, we used the Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 to induce a double-strand break within the expanded CTG repeat involved in myotonic dystrophy type 1, integrated in a yeast chromosome. Repair of this double-strand break generated unexpected large chromosomal deletions around the repeat tract. These deletions depended on RAD50, RAD52, DNL4 and SAE2, and both non-homologous end-joining and single-strand annealing pathways were involved. Resection and repair of the double-strand break (DSB) were totally abolished in a rad50Δ strain, whereas they were impaired in a sae2Δ mutant, only on the DSB end containing most of the repeat tract. This observation demonstrates that Sae2 plays significant different roles in resecting a DSB end containing a repeated and structured sequence as compared to a non-repeated DSB end. In addition, we also discovered that gene conversion was less efficient when the DSB could be repaired using a homologous template, suggesting that the trinucleotide repeat may interfere with gene conversion too. Altogether, these data show that SpCas9 may not be the best choice when inducing a double-strand break at or near a microsatellite, especially in mammalian genomes that contain many more dispersed repeated elements than the yeast genome.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedRecombination, GeneticChromosome DeletionChromosomes, FungalCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA End-Joining RepairDNA Ligase ATPDNA RepairEndonucleasesGene ConversionGenome, HumanHumansMyotonic DystrophyRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinCRISPR-Associated Protein 9DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Ligase ATPDNL4 protein, S cerevisiaeEndonucleasesRAD50 protein, S cerevisiaeRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinRAD52 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSAE2 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID32673314
PMCPMC7413560
OpenAlexW3043183892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.