Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32673265›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Del Nido Cardioplegia Versus Cold Blood Cardioplegia in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jessica Garcia-Suarez, Javier Garcia Fernandez, Sergio Sanz, Daniel Martinez Lopez, Leticia Reques, Alberto Forteza Gil

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04094168 (Clinical Outcomes of Del Nido Cardioplegia in Adult Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04094168 phase4completednot on this map

Clinical Outcomes of Del Nido Cardioplegia in Adult Cardiac Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJESSICA GARCIA SUAREZRan2018 to 2020Enrolled474ConditionsHeart, Surgery, Heart, Functional Disturbance as ResultArmsDEL NIDO CARDIOPLEGIA, COLD BLOOD BASED CARDIOPLEGIA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica Garcia-SuarezDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0287-2809
Javier Garcia FernandezDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7978-5506
Sergio SanzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7562-190X
Daniel Martinez LopezDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8076-4195
Leticia RequesDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0988-7974
Alberto Forteza GilDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6811-132X
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of cardioplegia solutions as a myocardial protection technique is essential during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The del Nido cardioplegia solution (DNS) has been widely used as a myocardial preservation technique for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Its unique pharmacological features have created growing interest for adult cardiac surgery, especially for elderly patients or those with ventricular dysfunction who are more prone to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Ever since its implementation, several retrospective studies have been published to validate the efficacy, safety, and efficiency of DNS in adult patients undergoing coronary revascularization, valve replacement, or combined procedures. Recently, a meta-analysis based on nine retrospective studies was published claiming the noninferiority of DNS compared to other conventional cardioplegia solutions. Few prospective randomized studies have been conducted whose primary outcome was the assessment of DNS clinical efficacy compared to other solutions commonly used in adult patients.

objectiveThe aim of this randomized clinical trial is to assess the benefits of DNS compared to Cardi-Braun blood cardioplegia solution in clinical and biochemical terms regarding myocardial protection during adult cardiac surgery.

methodsThis is the protocol of a controlled, randomized, single-center clinical trial carried out at the Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital in Spain. A total of 474 participants over the age of 18 years undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass will be assigned to groups by simple randomization to receive either DNS or Cardi-Braun blood cardioplegia solution. The primary outcome will be the differences between groups in myocardial protection in biochemical terms (ie, perioperative troponin levels) and clinical terms (ie, presence of the composite variable acute cardiovascular event). The clinical trial will be carried out under conditions of respect for the fundamental rights of the person and the ethical principles that affect biomedical research with human beings, as well as in accordance with international recommendations contained in the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions.

resultsThe inclusion process started in 2018. Data cleaning and analyses are expected to take place in the fall of 2020 and the results are expected in January 2021.

conclusionsThis study is particularly relevant as it will be one of the first to analyze the clinical effects of del Nido cardioplegia on the basis of direct myocardial protection parameters. In light of published studies, carrying out prospective studies based on primary clinical objectives with a larger sample, high-risk patients, and longer cardiopulmonary bypass times continues to be necessary. We believe that our study addresses an important gap in the knowledge of del Nido cardioplegia in adult patient cardiac surgery and will be able to clarify the possible benefits of this method in a large population of patients undergoing these procedures.

trial registrationEuropean Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) 2017-005144-14; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2017-005144-14+; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04094168; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04094168. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/17826.

Indexed as

cardiac surgerydel Nido cardioplegiamyocardial protection

Identifiers

PMID32673265
PMCPMC7388037
OpenAlexW3018113361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.