Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32673255›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Assessment of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Tailored Web- and Text-Based Smoking Cessation Support in Primary Care (iQuit in Practice II): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Joanna Proctor, Felix Naughton, Melanie Sloan, Sarah Hopewell, James Brimicombe, A Toby Prevost, Edward C F Wilson, Tim Coleman, Stephen Sutton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna Proctor *University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2138-3402
Felix Naughton *University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9790-2796
Melanie Sloan *University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-9064
Sarah Hopewell *University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-073X
James Brimicombe *University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3443-3256
A Toby Prevost *Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1723-0796
Edward C F WilsonUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8369-1577
Tim Coleman *University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7303-4805
Stephen SuttonUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-0404
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 20005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of smoking is declining; however, it continues to be a major public health burden. In England, primary care is the health setting that provides smoking cessation support to most smokers. However, this setting has one of the lowest success rates. The iQuit in practice intervention (iQuit) is a tailored web-based and text message intervention developed for use in primary care consultations as an adjunct to routine smoking cessation support with the aim of increasing success rates. iQuit has demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness.

objectiveThis definitive trial aims to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of iQuit when used as an adjunct to the usual support provided to patients who wish to quit smoking, compared with usual care alone.

methodsThe iQuit in Practice II trial is a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a 1:1 individual allocation comparing usual care (ie, pharmacotherapy combined with multisession behavioral support)-the control-with usual care plus iQuit-the intervention. Participants were recruited through primary care clinics and talked to a smoking cessation advisor. Participants were randomized during the initial consultation, and those allocated to the intervention group received a tailored advice report and 90 days of text messaging in addition to the standard support provided to all patients.

resultsThe primary outcome is self-reported prolonged abstinence biochemically verified using saliva cotinine at 6 months after the quit date. A sample size of 1700 participants, with 850 per arm, would yield 90% power to detect a 4.3% difference in validated quit rates between the groups at the two-sided 5% level of significance. The Cambridge East Research Ethics Committee approved the study in February 2016, and funding for the study was granted from May 2016. In total, 1671 participants were recruited between August 2016 and July 2019. Follow-up for all participants was completed in January 2020. Data analysis will begin in the summer of 2020.

conclusionsiQuit in Practice II is a definitive, pragmatic RCT assessing whether a digital intervention can augment the impact of routine smoking cessation support in primary care. Previous research has found good acceptability and feasibility for delivering iQuit among smoking cessation advisors working in primary care. If demonstrated to be cost-effective, iQuit could be delivered across primary care and other settings, such as community pharmacies. The potential benefit would likely be highest where less behavioral support is delivered.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 44559004; http://www.isrctn.com /ISRCTN44559004. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/17160.

Indexed as

adultsinternet-based interventionprimary caresmokerssmoking cessationtext messagingtobacco

Identifiers

PMID32673255
PMCPMC7388034
OpenAlexW3014646118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.